New OOA Non-aggression agreement

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by Pint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Class R didnt have a full rotation, a couple of the R guilds worked with each other to swap nobles but Asgard and bda both went the ynyd route.

I meant like the general rotation that is happening regarding all raid targets. I actually didn't know nobles were being rotated to any extent.

[Pint]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I meant like the general rotation that is happening regarding all raid targets. I actually didn't know nobles were being rotated to any extent.

Ah I just misread you my bad. Yea class R worked among ourselves to make it work for all of us in the best way we could. I'm confident we could add tmo and ib and still work something out but I'm really hesitant to think the staff want to add nobles to C/R/FFA, or at least that it would happen in a reasonable time frame.

[-Catherin-]

until IB speaks up you are all pretty much going back and forth to no real cause. Id like to hear what IB wants, or if they plan to agree to anything at all. Because regardless either way, we can arrange anything we want but if IB hasn't said anything, then nothing is going to happen.

[Argh]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We'll be happy with nobles rotating by Class-R/Class-C/FFA, ... That I'll sign to.

(While also observing a non-aggression towards OoA)

So, does TMO require the Nobles rotate C/R/FFA in an official capacity (added to raid.php) or is this something we can add to the terms of this agreement sharing the same GM enforced discipline? I think C/R/FFA cycle for noble is something all R guilds have already supported.

[Ella`Ella]

.

[Hokushin]

Can't we just rotate nobles and not kill ooas? Adding all these new rules seems like a pita.

[Pint]

Originally Posted by Hokushin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can't we just rotate nobles and not kill ooas? Adding all these new rules seems like a pita.

Probably not at this point. Asgard is comfortable moving forward on just IB's word to honor the agreement in the same way that we are ok with just accepting the other guild's word. However, since your guild was the one to throw a wrench in the last agreement I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that most of the other R guilds are going to require some form of deterrent to be in place so that y'all cannot simply have a bad day and ruin the agreement again without consequence. As for Tmo's requirement to get this off the ground, I'm guessing you've read up to this point.

[Argh]

The only rule other than not killing OoA is to not kill Noble when raid suspended.

[Ella`Ella]

Zero interest in putting any target on any sort of server wide rotation.

Again, we fully support R/C/FFA for nobles and non-aggression for overseers. However, at this point, I really don't care about the non-aggression for nobles - it would be nice, but it wouldn't be a deal breaker. I think we'll have more luck focusing on getting R/C/FFA implemented first and then we can add the OoA clause in.

[Argh]

We'll if the nobles were moved to an official C/R/FFA cycle it would officially be a raid mob, thus hands off during raid suspension.

The only question that still remains is whether or not you'll support C/R/FFA cycle enforced as a part of the agreement rather than enforced via raid.php