New OOA Non-aggression agreement

[Komodon]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maz, which cop am I supposed to be again?

The good one. Unless the situation involves Chest, in which case we switch.

Are we still pretending that this is not exactly what is happening? You can harp on me not caring for your guild (I dont) but you can stop pretending like its just blind hate, that we just pull this stuff out of nowhere and tmo has somehow not earned the bias attitude that most of us have. If you want to use this agreement to to force your agenda with ib then thats fine, we can play that game, but stop pretending like Im just jaded towards your guild, your guild is taking a stance that is going to negatively affect my guild.

Speaking of which, you sound a lot like Chest there. Just saying.

Again, if highlighting the problem of autofire use is a byproduct of our decision not to cater to you own individual need here, so be it. I don't have a problem with that. There's a lot more reasoning for us not to want to do that at this point though then some belief that IB will suddenly give a crap about what Asgard or anybody else thinks they should do. Regardless what you and a few of our friends want to speculate among yourselves.

Feel free to go back and read through the thread. It's all in there [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Pint]

Originally Posted by Komodon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Speaking of which, you sound a lot like Chest there. Just saying.

This is the single worst thing you've ever sad to me Maz and I'm sad that you can't take it back now = \

Originally Posted by Komodon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's a lot more reasoning for us not to want to do that at this point though then some belief that IB will suddenly give a crap about what Asgard or anybody else thinks they should do. Regardless what you and a few of our friends want to speculate among yourselves.

Originally Posted by Hokushin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We would like to see the nobles rotated OR only killed by the guild who has sky that day, without OOAs being killed.. with all guilds agreeing

That seems pretty close to what the rest of us are trying to achieve. This is not enough for you guys to move forward with, for me it seemed reasonable enough.

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by Pint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is the single worst thing you've ever sad to me Maz and I'm sad that you can't take it back now = \





That seems pretty close to what the rest of us are trying to achieve. This is not enough for you guys to move forward with, for me it seemed reasonable enough.

We'll be happy with nobles rotating by Class-R/Class-C/FFA, but not a full rotation like you have going in Class-R at the moment. That I'll sign to.

(While also observing a non-aggression towards OoA)

[Pint]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We'll be happy with nobles rotating by Class-R/Class-C/FFA, but not a full rotation like you have going in Class-R at the moment. That I'll sign to.

(While also observing a non-aggression towards OoA)

Class R didnt have a full rotation, a couple of the R guilds worked with each other to swap nobles but Asgard and bda both went the ynyd route.

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by Pint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Class R didnt have a full rotation, a couple of the R guilds worked with each other to swap nobles but Asgard and bda both went the ynyd route.

I meant like the general rotation that is happening regarding all raid targets. I actually didn't know nobles were being rotated to any extent.

[Pint]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I meant like the general rotation that is happening regarding all raid targets. I actually didn't know nobles were being rotated to any extent.

Ah I just misread you my bad. Yea class R worked among ourselves to make it work for all of us in the best way we could. I'm confident we could add tmo and ib and still work something out but I'm really hesitant to think the staff want to add nobles to C/R/FFA, or at least that it would happen in a reasonable time frame.

[-Catherin-]

until IB speaks up you are all pretty much going back and forth to no real cause. Id like to hear what IB wants, or if they plan to agree to anything at all. Because regardless either way, we can arrange anything we want but if IB hasn't said anything, then nothing is going to happen.

[Argh]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We'll be happy with nobles rotating by Class-R/Class-C/FFA, ... That I'll sign to.

(While also observing a non-aggression towards OoA)

So, does TMO require the Nobles rotate C/R/FFA in an official capacity (added to raid.php) or is this something we can add to the terms of this agreement sharing the same GM enforced discipline? I think C/R/FFA cycle for noble is something all R guilds have already supported.