Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 06-19-2014, 03:40 PM
Ambrotos Ambrotos is offline
VIP / Contributor

Ambrotos's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bktroost [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
*cough* /disarm OOA. /pick up Brass Knuckles. /trade Fire Beetle Eye to OOA. /Troll the server. *cough*

This guy gave it away. I would go to sky and give whatever freeti was up a fire beetle eye.
__________________
  #102  
Old 06-19-2014, 03:41 PM
zanderklocke zanderklocke is offline
Planar Protector

zanderklocke's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,244
Default

It seems like it would be pretty easy for someone in raid section to just create a thread that says if you agree to no more killing of OOAs, please sign here. It really doesn't need to be GM enforced.

The only guilds I do not see signing the agreement are IB and Dolj. Everyone else will sign.

At least agreeing this and people still FTE clicking for Nobles means there will be more Nobles to FTE click for. I'm not sure why people want to see so many things out of one agreement.

Why not just start an agreement that the only stipulation is no one killing OOAs, and in the future, maybe more people can come up with some ideas that guilds agree upon.

This is certainly not rocket science and really would not take much work to get people to agree to.

Like I said though, the only guilds who have not stated a clear position on OOA are IB and Dolj.
__________________
Previous Guilds: The A-Team <- Rapture <- Flawless Victory
Zanderr Locke - 60 Punk Rock Bard | Minnesota Nice - Monk | Squaresoft Chocobo - Shaman | Bowbafett | Supermetroid | Weaponx
Power Leveling Service | OT Hammers | Quillmane Quide
  #103  
Old 06-19-2014, 03:57 PM
bktroost bktroost is offline
Planar Protector

bktroost's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This guy gave it away. I would go to sky and give whatever freeti was up a fire beetle eye.
Ambrotos, you tell me all your secrets late at night when you have nothing else to do. Nemce knows all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmGMzyajA2U
__________________
  #104  
Old 06-19-2014, 03:58 PM
bktroost bktroost is offline
Planar Protector

bktroost's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zanderklocke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It seems like it would be pretty easy for someone in raid section to just create a thread that says if you agree to no more killing of OOAs, please sign here. It really doesn't need to be GM enforced.

The only guilds I do not see signing the agreement are IB and Dolj. Everyone else will sign.

At least agreeing this and people still FTE clicking for Nobles means there will be more Nobles to FTE click for. I'm not sure why people want to see so many things out of one agreement.

Why not just start an agreement that the only stipulation is no one killing OOAs, and in the future, maybe more people can come up with some ideas that guilds agree upon.

This is certainly not rocket science and really would not take much work to get people to agree to.

Like I said though, the only guilds who have not stated a clear position on OOA are IB and Dolj.
"We would like to see the nobles rotated OR only killed by the guild who has sky that day, without OOAs being killed.. with all guilds agreeing"--Hokushin.
__________________
  #105  
Old 06-19-2014, 04:06 PM
zanderklocke zanderklocke is offline
Planar Protector

zanderklocke's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,244
Default

The problem is that people are putting too many stipulations in what their agreement policy is. Honestly, I think the policy for the time being should just be "No one will kill OOAs." That's really all you need, and more can get figured out as time goes on. This will guarantee more Efreetis on the server than the situation that is happening right now.

In my opinion, it's the other stipulations that are bogging down the process of agreeing to not kill OOAs because not all guilds agree on those aspects being brought up.
__________________
Previous Guilds: The A-Team <- Rapture <- Flawless Victory
Zanderr Locke - 60 Punk Rock Bard | Minnesota Nice - Monk | Squaresoft Chocobo - Shaman | Bowbafett | Supermetroid | Weaponx
Power Leveling Service | OT Hammers | Quillmane Quide
  #106  
Old 06-19-2014, 04:14 PM
Cecily Cecily is offline
Planar Protector

Cecily's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Now I wonder what Cecily sounds like
That's funny because I can't say the same about you creeper.
  #107  
Old 06-19-2014, 04:15 PM
Tiggles Tiggles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Bring back old raid scene

Lot of ingrates getting free mobs
  #108  
Old 06-19-2014, 04:19 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

I don't understand why Overseer is such a valued mob that people choose to put their guild in a position like this. It's just one shitty Overseer, just fucking leave him up a couple times. Who cares if someone else kills it, that's their problem. Do you want a rotation or not?
  #109  
Old 06-19-2014, 04:20 PM
Detoxx Detoxx is offline
Planar Protector

Detoxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,648
Default

In light of Taken's repeated actions regarding the Overseers, TMO sees no reason to abide by the former agreement that was in place. We came to Taken yesterday with reason, suggesting that they are in a critical position to either stand down and be part of the solution by setting a precedent and not engaging or they could continue to exacerbate the problem by continuing to kill OoA's. Unfortunately, Taken chose the former.

In response, TMO will now begin keeping noble timer and engaging Noble as an FFA target and continuing on with the freeti cycle (Noble>Overseer>Hand) until further notice. We apologize in this unfortunate circumstance, but if we are to accept Taken's logic as to why they killed Overseer's than we must treat this situation in concordance to that line of rationale.
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
  #110  
Old 06-19-2014, 04:21 PM
Artaenc Artaenc is offline
Sarnak

Artaenc's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't understand why Overseer is such a valued mob that people choose to put their guild in a position like this. It's just one shitty Overseer, just fucking leave him up a couple times. Who cares if someone else kills it, that's their problem. Do you want a rotation or not?
some guilds can't see past pixels, it can be compared to an animal that has blinders on.
__________________
https://www.asgardguild.net Whoever wields this hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Thor! -Odin
https://www.twitch.tv/artaenc I stream other games on here also like Monster Hunter World

Guild Leader of <Asgard> The home of the gods!
Lightyear/Artah
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.