Noble Dojorn Timers

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by Artaenc [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"a noble" is not accurate here, more like Saturday and Tuesday Noble unless I got the days mixed up.

Saturday was our motion to take a noble in concurrence with our previously stated agreement. We felt Tuesday was an open contest. If we continue to observe the previous agreement, TMO will not engage 2 nobles within a 7-day period. If we engage a noble on a Thursday and an unanticipated noble spawns on our Sunday, we will concede it to A-Team who shares our day.

[Pint]

All that really matters now is whether or not we are all going to let Taken decide that the agreement is dead or whether we want to attempt to continue it. I know that Asgard has no issues with leaving Ooa's up in an attempt to keep the agreement alive. We can treat this as nothing more than a server reset and go from there. Obviously if IB decides to kill the Ooa's again then we can chalk this up to a failed experiment.

[Erati]

I spoke with Deru...

if we can get all Sky rotation guilds to agree on concise rules surrounding our agreement it will be enforced by the staff.

This is not a Taken thing, its really up to every guild on the Sky rotation on how we move forward, and how it is we see to it our agreement remains intact.

[-Catherin-]

If we have GM enforcement if everyone can agree then...

Make the noble cycle a raid target. (You cannot kill any of them if you are suspended)

And make killing the Overseer by anyone participating in the agreement grounds to have your guild suspended.

I would be happy if those two points could be enforced as it prevents anyone from going rogue like we have already witnessed. I think we can figure out the rest among ourselves.

[Pint]

Interesting that the staff would want to tie themselves to part of the sky agreement but it would definitely be reassuring. I dont mean to single out Taken but it was your guild leader who declared the agreement dead without consulting the rest of us. Asgard is not suggesting that the nobles enter the C/R/FFA cycle, we just liked the idea of leaving Ooa's up since that seemed to result in a net positive for everyone involved regardless of whether or not they want to rotate, ynyd or fte spam them.

[-Catherin-]

Give it a rest Pint.

Without everyone on board it pretty much IS dead. I'll remind you that the guild that started killing all the Overseers still hasn't commented.

I don't think anyone in Taken has refused to try to work something out - read the posts. But something DOES need to change.


We have just been made aware that we can get GM enforcement if we can actually agree on something for once... so lets drop the finger pointing and agree on something.

[Pint]

Give what a rest? Im only stating that Asgard wants the agreement back in place, others can feel free to chime in.

[Boilon]

Europa is still in favor of the agreement for what it is worth. We are also open to discussing with other guilds on how to proceed from this point. I think that it is a deep shame that we have lost the opportunity for the time being to kill any efreeti, but we hope that maybe this can be resolved.

[bktroost]

I like Catherin's modification to the original agreement.

1. Killing an OOA is punishable by GM staff with a minimum of 1 week suspension.
2. A guild under suspension is not able to kill Nobles/OOAs

[Drakakade]

Divinity supports Catherine's proposal, and supports the old OoA agreement (leaving them up to spawn nobles). It's regrettable that the OoA were killed since we were close to 1 a day nobles for all, but let's move on for the betterment of the server.