Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2014, 05:25 PM
LulzSect LulzSect is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 787
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #2  
Old 05-26-2014, 08:53 PM
nonphixion nonphixion is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 62
Default

80vs20 just as unfair as purposely training
  #3  
Old 05-26-2014, 09:53 PM
Drakaris Drakaris is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nonphixion [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
80vs20 just as unfair as purposely training
Except 80 players have made the effort to log on and training those 80 players (even though this number is fictional) is wasting 80 people's times so the 20 can whore loot by using tactics deemed illegal by the owner of the server.

If training players is justified based on numbers then what stops people forming 15 man guilds to farm pd crowns using trains to equalise the odds .

Azrael need to stop being loot whores and start mending the bridges between their existing players it was only the other day Quiet was gkicked and was pvping azrael solo at their bind.

Scum guild, had 45+ players, mass exodus occurs so the core try to justify training based on numbers.

Everyone knows you're scum.
  #4  
Old 05-26-2014, 10:04 PM
Colgate Colgate is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakaris [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Except 80 players have made the effort to log on and training those 80 players (even though this number is fictional) is wasting 80 people's times so the 20 can whore loot by using tactics deemed illegal by the owner of the server.

If training players is justified based on numbers then what stops people forming 15 man guilds to farm pd crowns using trains to equalise the odds .

Azrael need to stop being loot whores and start mending the bridges between their existing players it was only the other day Quiet was gkicked and was pvping azrael solo at their bind.

Scum guild, had 45+ players, mass exodus occurs so the core try to justify training based on numbers.

Everyone knows you're scum.
got prof?
  #5  
Old 05-26-2014, 10:15 PM
Pitborn Pitborn is offline
Fire Giant

Pitborn's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 570
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakaris [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Except 80 players have made the effort to log on and training those 80 players (even though this number is fictional) is wasting 80 people's times so the 20 can whore loot by using tactics deemed illegal by the owner of the server.

If training players is justified based on numbers then what stops people forming 15 man guilds to farm pd crowns using trains to equalise the odds .

Azrael need to stop being loot whores and start mending the bridges between their existing players it was only the other day Quiet was gkicked and was pvping azrael solo at their bind.

Scum guild, had 45+ players, mass exodus occurs so the core try to justify training based on numbers.

Everyone knows you're scum.
Because Nihilum never trains and has never had anyone banned for training before.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Drettj View Post
God bless Pitborn
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod View Post
if pitborn isn't online in your emulator, it probably should be wiped clean.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.