Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Shared Bank Option
Yes Gm's Should Make a Patch 86 48.31%
No Shared Bank is not Classic 79 44.38%
Gm's Should leave it the way it is 13 7.30%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-19-2014, 09:41 PM
BattleToad BattleToad is offline
Sarnak

BattleToad's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: East Coast
Posts: 256
Default

How about getting things out of your existing shared bank that is now invisible?
  #22  
Old 04-19-2014, 09:47 PM
Ele Ele is offline
Planar Protector

Ele's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shift [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about this Gm's need to put in the Patch, Shared Bank Slot to work so , we don't have to risk of 2 boxing for a good cause.
No.

We shouldn't even be able to sort items in our bank containers without first putting the containers into our main inventory.

Be grateful for what you have.
  #23  
Old 04-19-2014, 10:03 PM
rollin5k rollin5k is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 802
Default

Get real dog
  #24  
Old 04-19-2014, 10:21 PM
Clang Clang is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 28
Default

I voted yes for this - for the simple reason back in 2000 I ran 2 accounts. Having an extra account for my mage to get ports, transfer gear, etc etc was very nice and all quite legal and CLASSIC. I had 2 computers at the time, so boxing wasn't that hard - even though I didn't really do it on raids.

I'm not asking to drop the boxing exception (even though it's CLASSIC), simply because there are tools now allow you to automate boxing with ease. But it makes sense to drop some of the adherence to other CLASSIC rules that are annoying - and would have been gotten around with a 2nd legal account back in 2000.
  #25  
Old 04-19-2014, 10:30 PM
yevea yevea is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clang [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I voted yes for this - for the simple reason back in 2000 I ran 2 accounts. Having an extra account for my mage to get ports, transfer gear, etc etc was very nice and all quite legal and CLASSIC. I had 2 computers at the time, so boxing wasn't that hard - even though I didn't really do it on raids.

I'm not asking to drop the boxing exception (even though it's CLASSIC), simply because there are tools now allow you to automate boxing with ease. But it makes sense to drop some of the adherence to other CLASSIC rules that are annoying - and would have been gotten around with a 2nd legal account back in 2000.
oh boy.

you aren't paying a monthly fee for this server, shits not classic. deal with it, you don't get shared bank slots or 2boxing.
  #26  
Old 04-19-2014, 11:20 PM
Dragonsblood1987 Dragonsblood1987 is offline
Sarnak

Dragonsblood1987's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MURIKA
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shift [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about this Gm's need to put in the Patch, Shared Bank Slot to work so , we don't have to risk of 2 boxing for a good cause.

I know it's not classic but we are running on Titanium Client not original Ruins of Kunark

it would make it alot easier transfering items to your char's and other guildies if that other char is closer to give the items that are needing to be disbursed.

Thanks, Sincerely ,KiShift Leader of The Elite.

Vote up folks maybe they will do it so they will not have to ban people for accidenly 2 boxing trying to transfer items.
In addition to this, people wouldn't have to worry about getting banned by proxy for transferring for someone who might have been involved with rmt bullshit. Kinda has me paranoid that I might be on a list somewhere for unknowingly interacting with an rmter.
__________________
"Something something darkness something"-Nietzsche
  #27  
Old 04-19-2014, 11:24 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In addition to this, people wouldn't have to worry about getting banned by proxy for transferring for someone who might have been involved with rmt bullshit. Kinda has me paranoid that I might be on a list somewhere for unknowingly interacting with an rmter.
I don't want a shared bank because it isn't classic but I have similar worries as you regarding doing a transfer for someone and getting flagged. Since the last wave of bans I've refused to do any transfers except for RL friends.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #28  
Old 04-19-2014, 11:49 PM
Sarajo Sarajo is offline
Kobold

Sarajo's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonkec [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
add in a bunch of ezmode conveniences that were never classic so I can go 6box my way to victory in the hole? I prefer not to socialize and if you disagree with my request you are a noob fail that obviously wants to steal my pixels. Lets patch this bitch Diablo 3 style and make it the most single player mmo ever to exist!! Woo!
It's funny 'cuz EQLive!
  #29  
Old 04-20-2014, 01:05 PM
Yonkec Yonkec is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 144
Default

Did they not issue bans on live for people that broke the rules? That is nothing new, asking for huge concessions become someone else somewhere may at some time do something illegal and possibly may implicate you is not a reason to change the game. Why is it such a foreign concept to take responsibility for your own actions, if you are that worried about trading with someone and getting sucked into a ban wave, DONT FUCKING TRADE WITH RANDOMS. Problem solved without requiring shared bank slots. kthx

I would never agree to transfer a large amount of platinum from someone I dont know, or agree to trade their CoF and Prenerf Fungi Truncheon to their "alt". Why the shit would you? Anyone with that kind of scratch should have the intelligence to ask a trusted friend of their own and not /tell some unknown person standing in EC to assist. It's science.
Last edited by Yonkec; 04-20-2014 at 01:08 PM..
  #30  
Old 04-20-2014, 01:19 PM
Waedawen Waedawen is offline
Sarnak

Waedawen's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagaidh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What if we paid them a donation for a shared bank slot like some might think to try for a name change?
Wow

Neither of those ideas are ethical or legitimate
__________________
Petros Zolustias
Crexxus - Snoiche Tathunoiche

"... I don't think I remember him digging for this long..."

The A-Team

twitch.tv/crexxus
Last edited by Waedawen; 04-20-2014 at 01:22 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.