The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread! - Page 41

Scrooge · #**401** 04-15-2014, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

youve shown absolutely nothing to back up that claim, no REAL Evidence. i wont even mention the photos or videos, its all theory and conspiracy.

What do you consider "real evidence" to be? The videos and images speak for themselves, if you actually watch them.

If you think it's not enough evidence, feel free to research it for yourself, I've been encouraging that line of thought since the beginning, yet some of you can't seem to grasp that much.

Like the video with the long ass tongues for example, do you personally know any regular people with tongues that long? Or how about the latest video I posted here, with the guy in the background on some TV show, staring right at the camera with his big slitted eyes?!

Glenzig · #**402** 04-15-2014, 08:02 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor View Post
http://www.whatchristianswanttoknow....ibutes-of-god/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribu...n_Christianity

http://www.equip.org/articles/the-at...ibutes-of-god/

http://www.theopedia.com/List_of_God's_known_attributes

it's what they believe in, but the early church fucked up by platonizing the religion. then again if they didn't there probably would be no church to refer to as the early church.""

Just because people believe that about God, doesn't make it factual. Its not supported by scripture. Its a perverting of what's found in the bible by blending it with lo g held human philosophies. Much like Darwinism is a perversion of scientific evidence by blending it with long held human philosophies. No difference really.

radditsu · #**403** 04-15-2014, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What do you consider "real evidence" to be? The videos and images speak for themselves, if you actually watch them.

If you think it's not enough evidence, feel free to research it for yourself, I've been encouraging that line of thought since the beginning, yet some of you can't seem to grasp that much.

Like the video with the long ass tongues for example, do you personally know any regular people with tongues that long? Or how about the latest video I posted here, with the guy in the background on some TV show, staring right at the camera with his big slitted eyes?!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rhambuk · #**404** 04-15-2014, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What do you consider "real evidence" to be? The videos and images speak for themselves, if you actually watch them.

If you think it's not enough evidence, feel free to research it for yourself, I've been encouraging that line of thought since the beginning, yet some of you can't seem to grasp that much.

Like the video with the long ass tongues for example, do you personally know any regular people with tongues that long? Or how about the latest video I posted here, with the guy in the background on some TV show, staring right at the camera with his big slitted eyes?!

If those video's are enough for you thats great, they mean nothing to me personally. Not convinced at all. Any of the links with theory is just that it SOUNDS plausible but there is nothing to actually back it up other than strange coincidences and photos/video's.

again, that is not enough to convince me. Some people have redeye in photo's that doesn't mean they are possessed by a demon and only the photo shows the true evil behind their eyes...its just a technological glitch.

Ahldagor · #**405** 04-15-2014, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol? You're so fucking retarded it's unbelievable. There is no evidence for the RNA world hypothesis you dumb fuck. That's why it's called the RNA world HYPOTHESIS. Please kill yourself.

Here's just one example of your retardation from the post you linked.

Keywords : "most likely". Wow that sure is some strong evidence you got there bro. Don't worry guys, it's most likely that U-DNA was the first step in the emergence of DNA. Since we have no actual fucking clue if it's true or not, we'll just say it's most likely and dumb fucks like Ahldagor will believe that shit because they are too stupid to think for them self and can't differentiate between actual evidence and bullshit.

you have yet to define god in an original way to me, so how can i trust your invectives? your troll is tired, let it sleep.

Ahldagor · #**406** 04-15-2014, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ahldagor · #**407** 04-15-2014, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor View Post
http://www.whatchristianswanttoknow....ibutes-of-god/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribu...n_Christianity

http://www.equip.org/articles/the-at...ibutes-of-god/

http://www.theopedia.com/List_of_God's_known_attributes

it's what they believe in, but the early church fucked up by platonizing the religion. then again if they didn't there probably would be no church to refer to as the early church.""

Just because people believe that about God, doesn't make it factual. Its not supported by scripture. Its a perverting of what's found in the bible by blending it with lo g held human philosophies. Much like Darwinism is a perversion of scientific evidence by blending it with long held human philosophies. No difference really.

the last part of my post, and don't forget "on earth as it is in heaven"