The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread!

[Scrooge]

It's ok, you're a better troll than I could ever hope to be, you can relax now, I've admitted the truth!

But keep bumping my thread for all to see, even the most common troll can be useful - if properly motivated.

[Grimfan]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

then god would not be all powerful. the rigidity is there because this is rhetorical discourse which is dictated by logic, the law of non-contradiction. there is no free will in the abrahamic model due to the events having only come into possibility via god's will. so that 3 year old with leukemia that will die from it any day now is god's will.

Honestly the god you're talking about isn't the god that Christians believe in, although what you described is correct, you cannot have a god with all three o's.

[r00t]

good and evil are subjective

I can say driving my car is good cuz I can do more shit and you can say its evil cuz I am contributing to (fake) global warming

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Grimfan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Honestly the god you're talking about isn't the god that Christians believe in, although what you described is correct, you cannot have a god with all three o's.

http://www.whatchristianswanttoknow....ibutes-of-god/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribu...n_Christianity

http://www.equip.org/articles/the-at...ibutes-of-god/

http://www.theopedia.com/List_of_God's_known_attributes

it's what they believe in, but the early church fucked up by platonizing the religion. then again if they didn't there probably would be no church to refer to as the early church

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

good and evil are subjective

I can say driving my car is good cuz I can do more shit and you can say its evil cuz I am contributing to (fake) global warming

it's not a question of valuation

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's ok, you're a better troll than I could ever hope to be, you can relax now, I've admitted the truth!

But keep bumping my thread for all to see, even the most common troll can be useful - if properly motivated.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[valarmorghulis]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

thank you for proving my point. dna had to be labelled and deciphered by humans with a human system.

How does that prove your point? Hieroglyph's had to be labeled and decipher by humans with a human system as well. DNA is the same exact thing as hieroglyph's only they are much smaller and can't be seen with the naked eye. So wtf are you talking about dude?

everything you're using is man made so why are you using it? you've factored out the possibility that god can't exist or has not ever existed (cogito ergo sum on your end so read up some heidegger) and when that possibility is put on the table you've ignored it. you're using logical systems that don't support your own claims or beliefs.

You obviously don't know what arbitrary means. It's exceedingly difficult to correct your ignorance if you can't even grasp the words you are reading.

so you pick out the one thing in the summary of the study (the inroduction) that seems to agree with your weltanschauung while ignoring the following sentences thus taking it out of context. your troll is tired, let it sleep.

It's not out of context at all. First of all the entire article you linked is a mere hypothesis with zero supporting evidence. Second of all it suggests that virus'/RNA preceded DNA which is a literal impossibility since first of all, RNA on it's own cannot create a living cell and a virus remains permanently dormant until infecting a DNA based host. Without DNA, RNA and virus' are lifeless and useless, sorta like you.

computer code is computer code. if your encoding information on dna then you're using organic methods and not strictly computer code. comparing coding eq to the creation of dna is absurd.

Yes you're right, comparing DNA to EQ coding is absurd but what's far more ridiculously absurd is suggesting that DNA, which is unimaginably more complex than EQ's code, some how managed to form randomly on it's own with zero intelligent guidance of any kind. Only a special kind of stupid can achieve mental gymnastics of this caliber.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i have to save face by replying to my secret crush ahldagor, so i've replied to his notions the only way i know how to by presenting an aggressive tone in order to woo his witty, well thought out, logically charmed arguments that flow from his fingers to enable his fingers into my butt prepping my anus for his spit lubed penis

thank you for that compliment, but i don't know you well enough to have sex with you

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

then god would not be all powerful. the rigidity is there because this is rhetorical discourse which is dictated by logic, the law of non-contradiction. there is no free will in the abrahamic model due to the events having only come into possibility via god's will. so that 3 year old with leukemia that will die from it any day now is god's will.

If that's he model you use to describe god, please don't say its based on the bible. That's so far off it isn't funny.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If that's he model you use to describe god, please don't say its based on the bible. That's so far off it isn't funny.

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.whatchristianswanttoknow....ibutes-of-god/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribu...n_Christianity

http://www.equip.org/articles/the-at...ibutes-of-god/

http://www.theopedia.com/List_of_God's_known_attributes

it's what they believe in, but the early church fucked up by platonizing the religion. then again if they didn't there probably would be no church to refer to as the early church