The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread!

[Scrooge]

Originally Posted by rgostic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ever heard of the term tree of life?

When a tree sprouts a branch, what happens to the trunk?

Vegetation and Mammals are two very different things, wouldn't you say?!

[Rellapse40]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No sorry I don't feels because what you just said is completely retarded. The only thing a reptile can produce is more reptiles. They can't evolve into another creature. If it's a frog now, it will always be a frog and has always been a frog. Frog's can only produce more frogs and frogs can only come from other frogs. If it's a snake now, it will always be a snake and has always been a snake. Snakes can only produce more snakes and snakes can only come from other snakes.

The same goes for literally every single living thing on this planet. Every living thing can only produce more of what it already is. Birds make more birds, dogs make more dogs, cats make more cats etc. This can be broken down even further. For instance a blue jay can only produce more blue jays and a blue jay can only come from previously existing blue jays. A German shepherd can only produce more German shepherds and can only come from previously existing German shepherds. A tiger can only produce more tigers and tigers can only come from previously existing tigers.

Sorry but no, we did not evolve from reptiles. In fact, reptiles have never evolved into anything other than more reptiles.

Just b/c your christian beliefs may not support this does not mean we did not evolve from reptiles.

The oldest most primitive part of our brain has reptilian in it's name.

If there were never people thinking outside the box (like you) and believed in just shit they can see. The world would still be flat.

[rgostic]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No sorry I don't feels because what you just said is completely retarded. The only thing a reptile can produce is more reptiles. They can't evolve into another creature. If it's a frog now, it will always be a frog and has always been a frog. Frog's can only produce more frogs and frogs can only come from other frogs. If it's a snake now, it will always be a snake and has always been a snake. Snakes can only produce more snakes and snakes can only come from other snakes.

The same goes for literally every single living thing on this planet. Every living thing can only produce more of what it already is. Birds make more birds, dogs make more dogs, cats make more cats etc. This can be broken down even further. For instance a blue jay can only produce more blue jays and a blue jay can only come from previously existing blue jays. A German shepherd can only produce more German shepherds and can only come from previously existing German shepherds. A tiger can only produce more tigers and tigers can only come from previously existing tigers.

Sorry but no, we did not evolve from reptiles. In fact, reptiles have never evolved into anything other than more reptiles.

You don't understand the implications of sexual reproduction.

Your idea doesn't hold water because only asexual organisms are clones of their parents.

If you cannot grasp how populations can change over time due to variance in the size and shape of an organisms body parts in response to changing environmental conditions you have not been educated sufficiently.

Speciation has been observed and studied in the field.

Read "The Beak of the Finch".

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ya 50 words that you realized were retarded as fuck. Oh and my logic eats itself but you can't explain how. Rofl. See, when I make a claim, I actually back it up with an actual argument. When you make a claim, that's literally all you fucking do because you know that if you actually tried to explain yourself, your stupidity and lack of an actual logical reason would be exposed.

how can god be uncaused in an a priori model. i've backed my claim earlier in the thread which you would have known if you actually read the thread.

[Scrooge]

Originally Posted by Rellapse40 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The world would still be flat.

You know what's interesting about that is, that there is this "Flat Earth" theory going around, where they claim to prove that the Earth isn't actually a ball - but a conclave instead. It's circular, but not an actual "ball" so to speak, or so the theory states.

They actually present some hard to deny evidence of this too, it does sound silly, but wtf do we really know? Only what we've been told all our lives, without any concrete evidence. I don't know if it's bullshit or not, but I think it's interesting enough to research nonetheless, just like the Reptilian Humanoid theory this thread is (or was?) about.

Watch this series of videos (they're short), and let me know what you think! For those who like to dismiss information without first checking it out, these videos involve one of NASA's own, spilling the beans on what we think of as pure conjencture.

"Proof the Earth is Flat, NASA lies!" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ih_Qq-WBYY
Part 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmUrUrWmmaA
Part 3 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvQowaN6UHQ
Part 4 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bqj7fNaw8-Y
Part 5 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAnfhm4ZZ-4

[radditsu]

You can buy a camera and rocket that flies into the edge of the atmosphere. .... the earth is round. People send weather balloons up into the stratosphere. That crazy virgin atlantic guy is building a rocket for commercial space flight. There are private companies running supplies to space stations. None of these people have any reason to lie.


See? Troll thread.

[Rhambuk]

hes already added you to his ignore rad, he ignores everyone that disagrees.

Now a flat earth theory? This guy is just going to blink out of existence because he reads a theory about how nothing is real.

[Lojik]

I don't know if it's crazier that he believes beings from cabilis are going to take over or that RT is a reliable news source.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Lojik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't know if it's crazier that he believes beings from cabilis are going to take over or that RT is a reliable news source.

not going to but have taken over with their interstellar spacecraft with unlimited fuel

[Azure]

reading whats left of this thread makes me proud of my posts... and secure in my intelligence

and yes. I truly do understand the deep criticism many have had for what I have typed into the intertubes