The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread!

[Scrooge]

I felt this belonged here too:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[valarmorghulis]

The Earth, Mars, and Venus are all roughly 4.5B years old. Intelligent life could have evolved and died out on Venus and Mars long before it even started on the Earth.

Intelligent life doesn't evolve, period. It can only be created. There is no such thing as inanimate molecules "evolving" to become an intelligent life form. Life can only come from life. This is the essence of the law of biogenesis.

[Scrooge]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Intelligent life doesn't evolve, period. It can only be created. There is no such thing as inanimate molecules "evolving" to become an intelligent life form. Life can only come from life. This is the essence of the law of biogenesis.

I have to agree with that statement. There was recently a docu on YT, in regards to Evolution, where an academic went to the various Universities and Colleges all over the US, to confront other academics who support Darwin's Evolution theory. However, when they were asked to provide direct proof or examples where the theory evolution can be proven, none of them were able to come up with an answer.

The theory of Evolution is just that, a theory; it looks interesting on paper, but does not have any irrefutable evidence to support itself.

[Scrooge]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It isn't a human shifting into a different creature, it an aberration in the recording. Plain and simple.

Tell that to the guy with Reptilian claws in this newspaper article:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Original Video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpoLKcR7Keo

Looks awfully similar to Keanu Reeves' claws from 'The Matrix:'

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Azure]

Originally Posted by moklianne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mars and Venus could have been Earths of the distant past.

^^^ pretty much. Who says humans were the first to roam the solar system??? We have plenty time in which for this to happen from either planet.

Though I think unless something else happened to boil off or drastically decrease earths atmosphere. I don't think we'd reach mars levels of aridity. We might be able to get a runaway greenhouse affect that boils the oceans into the atmosphere though and get very Venus like.

Even a weak magnetic field wouldn't kill the earth completely. IMO. Hard to say.

[Zadrian]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Intelligent life doesn't evolve, period. It can only be created. There is no such thing as inanimate molecules "evolving" to become an intelligent life form. Life can only come from life. This is the essence of the law of biogenesis.

Except that first life. That life came from nothing, right?

[Zadrian]

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have to agree with that statement. There was recently a docu on YT, in regards to Evolution, where an academic went to the various Universities and Colleges all over the US, to confront other academics who support Darwin's Evolution theory. However, when they were asked to provide direct proof or examples where the theory evolution can be proven, none of them were able to come up with an answer.

The theory of Evolution is just that, a theory; it looks interesting on paper, but does not have any irrefutable evidence to support itself.

Learn the difference between an average theory and a scientific theory.

Secondly, the law of biogenesis does not contradict the theory of evolution - the fact that you are attempting to imply that, just shows your ignorance about the subject.

[valarmorghulis]

Originally Posted by Zadrian [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Except that first life. That life came from nothing, right?

No, the first life is God. This is referring to life within the physical Universe. The first of every life form had to be created. Hence the question, which came first, the chicken or the egg? It's literally impossible that either could have come first since each requires the other to already exist in order to come into existence. This means then that the first of each life form was specifically created.

Secondly, the law of biogenesis does not contradict the theory of evolution - the fact that you are attempting to imply that, just shows your ignorance about the subject.

Actually it does because according to the law of biogenesis, all life forms can only produce after their own kind. For instance, cats come from cats and cats only produce more cats. Dogs only come from other dogs and can only produce more dogs etc,. Same goes for literally every single living thing you can think of. Horses? Come from other horses and only produce more horses. Bee's? Only come from other bee's and only produce more bee's. Birds? Only come from other birds and only produce more birds. No evidence ever observed in the history of the world has ever contradicted this established scientific fact.

Not only does the law of biogenesis and cell theory contradict evolution but so does the laws of thermodynamics. Energy is heading towards entropy. The evolution of molecules into ever increasingly complex forms is the literal opposite of what the laws of thermodynamics tell us. That energy is constantly breaking down over time and becoming less complex until ultimately all energy in existence will achieve a state of maximum entropy and will then become inert and useless.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I felt this belonged here too:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

there's so much wrong with all of this...


murdoch's thumb and index finger look like a thumb and index finger in a clear photograph. that's impossible!

[Zadrian]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, the first life is God. This is referring to life within the physical Universe. The first of every life form had to be created. Hence the question, which came first, the chicken or the egg? It's literally impossible that either could have come first since each requires the other to already exist in order to come into existence. This means then that the first of each life form was specifically created.



Actually it does because according to the law of biogenesis, all life forms can only produce after their own kind. For instance, cats come from cats and cats only produce more cats. Dogs only come from other dogs and can only produce more dogs etc,. Same goes for literally every single living thing you can think of. Horses? Come from other horses and only produce more horses. Bee's? Only come from other bee's and only produce more bee's. Birds? Only come from other birds and only produce more birds. No evidence ever observed in the history of the world has ever contradicted this established scientific fact.

Not only does the law of biogenesis and cell theory contradict evolution but so does the laws of thermodynamics. Energy is heading towards entropy. The evolution of molecules into ever increasingly complex forms is the literal opposite of what the laws of thermodynamics tell us. That energy is constantly breaking down over time and becoming less complex until ultimately all energy in existence will achieve a state of maximum entropy and will then become inert and useless.

Show me proof of god.

You realize that the earth is an open system right?