The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread!

[Azure]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Except there is only very weak anecdotal evidence for Nibiru. If you could even call it evidence. Trying to force ancient Sumerian carvings to mean that they had found an additional planet in our solar system is hardly what I would call evidence.

That's what I'm talking about. It's not even specific enough to say if it was a lost planet, or there was once a missing planet... or were they counting from the outside in or the inside out... in their astrology/astronomy.

We can only make a best guess at what nibiru was... was it a giant comet...etc... (hence my guess that nibiru was actually Mars) - I say mars because it's atmosphere was once more rich and it has "artifacts" and "anomalies".

A giant gass giant is much less likely to have large hominid species. So I think most of the Niburu theories are complete bullshit in that regard. That and If the Anunaki are our ancestors and the Sumerians were writing about the end of the Anunaki civilization. The best place for them to be from would have been Mars.

Anyway - nifty: http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/...fm?Object=KBOs

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's too many options for Nibiru...

Not to mention the big bright object we saw passing the sun 2012/late 2013 which was massive and is now well on its way out. Was only caught on a few frames though before JPL had the databanks scrubbed/shopped.

Most likely it was unremarkable other than it was evidence the Sumerians may have known more about astronomy than we'd like to give em credit for.

[Glenzig]

Well that runs contrary to the fact that the Sumerians knew very well what and where mars was. So that theory kinda goes out the window when you look at what they actually knew about astronomy.

[Azure]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well that runs contrary to the fact that the Sumerians knew very well what and where mars was. So that theory kinda goes out the window when you look at what they actually knew about astronomy.

I've got to go do some research. TBH I havn't done my own. And I've only heard people talk about the theory. I never heard anyone say they specifically identified mars as planet XYZ

But if your right... and I believe you more or less. Than my theory goes out the window about Nibiru being mars.

[Scrooge]

There have been many predictions on Nibiru, among other celestial objects such as Comet ISON (which people think disintegrated, but only because they haven't seen close-ups of the original - it being an artificial object.)

As for proof of it's existance, there are many 'recent' images on this subject, it's existance is far more than just archaelogical evidence of the Sumerians.

There was an image with Nibiru showing on Google Sky, at specific coordinates, then it was censored by the 'you know who.' This is an old image, I cannot find the pre-censored version, but don't you wonder why would they literally cut something out the way they have?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's an article with more info on this from Dec 2011, http://banisblog.blogspot.com/2011/1...le-skywhy.html

Anyway, it's been a while since the last post of the Reptilian Interview, soon I'll post them in their proper order so they make more sense to those of you interested in knowing more.

[Azure]

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There have been many predictions on Nibiru, among other celestial objects such as Comet ISON (which people think disintegrated, but only because they haven't seen close-ups of the original - it being an artificial object.)

As for proof of it's existance, there are many 'recent' images on this subject, it's existance is far more than just archaelogical evidence of the Sumerians.

There was an image with Nibiru showing on Google Sky, at specific coordinates, then it was censored by the 'you know who.' This is an old image, I cannot find the pre-censored version, but don't you wonder why would they literally cut something out the way they have?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's an article with more info on this from Dec 2011, http://banisblog.blogspot.com/2011/1...le-skywhy.html

Anyway, it's been a while since the last post of the Reptilian Interview, soon I'll post them in their proper order so they make more sense to those of you interested in knowing more.

Cool info thx )

[Fame]

History channel has been a success.

[Azure]

Originally Posted by Fame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

History channel has been a success.

They use to have some pretty good docu's up but the recent quality of the ancient astronaut things have went down hill. And there's better movies/sources for alternative historical viewpoints. Unfortunately their really outdated now and hard to find.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There have been many predictions on Nibiru, among other celestial objects such as Comet ISON (which people think disintegrated, but only because they haven't seen close-ups of the original - it being an artificial object.)

As for proof of it's existance, there are many 'recent' images on this subject, it's existance is far more than just archaelogical evidence of the Sumerians.

There was an image with Nibiru showing on Google Sky, at specific coordinates, then it was censored by the 'you know who.' This is an old image, I cannot find the pre-censored version, but don't you wonder why would they literally cut something out the way they have?

[IMG]http://jimmyprophet.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/nibiru-blocked-3-googleearth_image1.jpg[/IMG

There's an article with more info on this from Dec 2011, http://banisblog.blogspot.com/2011/1...le-skywhy.html

Anyway, it's been a while since the last post of the Reptilian Interview, soon I'll post them in their proper order so they make more sense to those of you interested in knowing more.

Or....it was just a regular image with nothing anomalous and "you know who" edited it to perpetuate ridiculous theories such as this. Both assumptions are unprovable,and ultimately are meaningless, but each is as defendable as the other.

[moklianne]

Mars and Venus could have been Earths of the distant past.

If you look at them now, which path are we currently on? Will Earth become Mars or Venus in another couple of thousand years of humankind on it? I don't see this correlation with other objects in the solar system.

I forget the movie, but the end really struck me. It was a typical exploring Mars movie. In the end, they found a holographic chamber that told the story on how the Earth was first seeded. Mars was dying and civilization left, but a pod stayed behind to seed Earth.


"If it wasn't for the runaway greenhouse effect of its 96% carbon dioxide atmosphere, Venus would be able to support life, although you'd feel like living in the Sahara. The only problem then would be if there would be enough nutrients to support Earth life (including water).

With Mars the problem is serious in the other way. It's too cold and its atmosphere is too thin. Even if you'd pump greenhouse gases into it, it would require some heavy molecules so that they wouldn't reach escape velocity even when heating up the planet. "

The Earth, Mars, and Venus are all roughly 4.5B years old. Intelligent life could have evolved and died out on Venus and Mars long before it even started on the Earth.

Mars could have lost its protective EM field from a nasty blast from the sun. Or perhaps something happened to its core to weaken its EM field. Maybe Venus' civilizations changed their climate too much and it couldn't recover. Its fun to speculate. I hope we continue to explore Mars and our other close neighbors often.

[phacemeltar]

this thread is gettin good