in the back yard

[Tomeofdiscord]

Originally Posted by Weekapaug [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Congratulations, you are officially the stupidest, most ignorant imbecile I've encountered in my 4 years on these forums. Quite a feat.

What you, apparently, fail to grasp is that you are being called out for advancing stereotypes when you, obviously, have no clue what you are talking about. Tennessee is a beautiful state complete with cities,*suburbs, and rural areas and people that go with those places. Just like anywhere else. I guarantee there are as many ATVs and trailers "shitting up the place" in Colorado if you look in the right places just like we have Prius driving hipsters here, which is pretty much what I've been saying since schooling you with your first post. Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing. Yep, we've got hicks. But so do you. And simply being from a particular state doesn't make someone necessarily a hick or Cletus or anything else. It's offensive and, frankly, is no different than stereotyping someone based on their race or gender. And all of this from you because a guy posted pics of wild turkeys in his back yard and mentions hunting. Seriously, are you are a real winner.

And, yeah, I know what apartments in Manhattan cost. I lived there for better part of a decade. Loved it. Then I moved here. Love it too. By the way, I encountered more inbred white trash in upstate NY during my time up there than I ever have here. Notice I'm not generalizing, but simply mentioning what I observed when I actually, you know, went there myself.

I say again for, I think, a third time...You're an idiot.

Oh, and go fuck yourself.

/owned

[Nocsucow]

[IMG][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][/IMG]

fun times

[Nocsucow]

Originally Posted by Tomeofdiscord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

/owned

he done this the first time he posted

[Goofier]

Originally Posted by Nocsucow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[IMG]fun times

Yeah, I'm with ya, fuck Nazi York.
Can't do this there:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d32_1353400164

[LulzSect]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Nocsucow]

biggest hater on forums ^^^^^^ this guy

[LulzSect]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lojik]

Originally Posted by LulzSect [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dig that vid

[Nocsucow]

[IMG][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][/IMG]

[BigHurb]

Originally Posted by BigHurb [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

CO2 cooling the planet is misleading. The greenhouse gases block solar rays, yes... but in no way does the NASA study claim a long term benefit from increased CO2 levels.

There is quite a bit of observation to assert a trend in climate change is due to human activity, the changes will have negative consequences, and will not stop unless there are changes in our behaviors.


This meeting just took place March 10th 2014:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...A291PE20140310


In regards to CO2 levels:

"Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation"
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture10915.html

"CO2 [has] led and was the primary driver behind most of the glacial-interglacial warming. According to the Shakun et al. data, approximately 7% of the overall glacial-interglacial global temperature increase occurred before the CO2 rise, whereas 93% of the global warming followed the CO2 increase."


In regards to "ice" levels:

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2008-010

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v.../ngeo1767.html

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/338/6111/1183

Antarctica is losing LAND ice as a whole. The gain in SEA ice is part of a complex negative feedback cycle. Essentially, an increase in sea ice is not a good sign that the environment is experiencing an extended trend which will reverse. Ice AREA and MASS are different things as well.


Here is a list of organizations that accept anthropogenic global warming as real and scientifically well-supported:

NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS): http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm

National Academy of Sciences (NAS): http://books.nap.edu/collections/glo...ing/index.html

State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC) – http://www.socc.ca/permafrost/permafrost_future_e.cfm

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): http://epa.gov/climatechange/index.html

The Royal Society of the UK (RS) – http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=3135

American Geophysical Union (AGU): http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/cl..._position.html

American Meteorological Society (AMS): http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/climat...arch_2003.html

American Institute of Physics (AIP): http://www.aip.org/gov/policy12.html

National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): http://eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html

American Meteorological Society (AMS): http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/jointacademies.html

Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS): http://www.cmos.ca/climatechangepole.html

In short:

"Every major scientific institution dealing with climate, ocean, and/or atmosphere agrees that the climate is warming rapidly and the primary cause is human CO2 emissions."

Further reading:

http://www.davidsuzuki.org/issues/cl...hange-deniers/