The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread!

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Atlantis is almost definitely the frozen continent of Antarctica and those that escaped the destruction of Atlantis all went on to become the mythological gods of all ancient civilizations around the world.

nah that was the celts man. we're freaking giants and we just rofl stomped everyone we came across spreading our seed too.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person" - Aristotle

but this is a damn good song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1pi7Dn87mY

[Breeziyo]

Most modern video systems have automatic smoothing filters built into them. It’s to remove noise from the digital image and noise produced by video compression.This can cause high contrast areas to get a bit “blobby” where it transitions between dark/light. Including exactly what’s seen in this video. Inconclusive at best, and from someone who works in digital video, 90% chance this is just artifacting.

also http://vision.arc.nasa.gov/publicati...4ah/94sid.html

from the article some dude linked earlier

reptilian nerds getting blown the fuck out

[Scrooge]

There's quite a big difference between visual artifacts, and when someone's hand looks like it belongs to a piglet or when one eye turns into a slit for a brief moment. If this was really a visual error, then it would be alot more common, wouldn't it? How about if only the eyes are changing, and the rest of the image is complete, how do you account for that?

Also, I've mentioned it before and I'll mention it again, these mutations occur to these "people" themselves, and it's very easy to verify. Especially if you inspect a sample from a popular TV series or movie, surely such "artifacts" wouldn't show up on a retail Bluray (like Keanu's claw in The Matrix,) would they? You can keep living in denial all you want, it won't change the fact that this is real and is going on under everyone's noses without being seen by the masses. It's alot like with the UFO scene, the majority will try to discredit every bit of evidence shown no matter how real it may be, even if it was seen and captured on film by hundreds of different people who've never met.

Since when do visual errors occur only in those very specific areas, and if they're really common visual errors, then it wouldn't be so hard to reproduce. Anyway, if you can't accept this kind of content - feel free to leave the thread, I'm posting all this for the people who do find this interesting - it's that simple.

update
Hillary Clinton Reptilian Eye - On Her Official Photo! - This is a photo she approved for a book "Heaven to Hell" by David La Chapellle (not the comedian obviously.)

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Zadrian]

I guess with the release of Ninja Turtles and Godzilla in the same year, you can't really deny that Reptoids run the media.

Here, you can see that Megan Fox associates with them and it's not even grainy!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

update
Hillary Clinton Reptilian Eye - On Her Official Photo! - This is a photo she approved for a book "Heaven to Hell" by David La Chapellle (not the comedian obviously.)

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Given the quality of that photo, you could just as easily theorize that she is actually made out of Lego blocks (possibly even Duplo).

[Scrooge]

Quality is as good as YouTube will allow it, no matter how good the source. Most of these images are close-ups of far away shots, in other words the camera isn't right in their face - but so far away that you have to zoom in to make certain details out. It's kind of like upscaling a DVD movie to be at 720p or 1080, but all it does is stretch the image, it won't look any better - just blurry.

Most photographic images will get blurrier and distorted, the more you zoom into them. You could make it look better through certain software editors and filters, but I personally don't require an image to be a perfect 10/10 to accept the content as being true.

If you judge every video and image based on it's quality alone, so that anything less than perfect is false, then all videos and images taken before the DVD era fall into that category.

Young people who never went through the VHS era, think that HD 1080p quality has always been around, but the truth is, it's not even a decade old.

With this flawed logic, if a certain documentary only has a VHS source, does that make it any less real?

[harnold]

I didnt read the thread but I did just draw a lizard picture to end the thread on a good note [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] forgot to make it green

[Rhambuk]

secret race of alien lizards that can mimic the human body slowly rise to power and take over the media industry to make terrible music and remakes of 30 year old movies.

Were doomed

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Tomeofdiscord]

This shit is hysterical. I hope your just trolling...