SK, Paladin, or Bard?

[Rhambuk]

I would never make a dark elf. 2 reasons,

1) I can't stand ultravision

2) they are disgustingly common everyone is a DE

[Buns]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would never make a dark elf. 2 reasons,

1) I can't stand ultravision

2) they are disgustingly common everyone is a DE

You hate everyone. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Fael]

Lets do it pint.

Lets go to howling stone south. Ill bring both bard and pally. And u bring ur cleric. lets test which one is more effective tank.

Dolic

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Buns [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You hate everyone. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't hate you,

yet!

I guess its the hipster in me, if its popular I don't like it. Just gotta go against the grain.

if DE's could be paladins... I don't think id play here

[Crawdad]

Originally Posted by Buns [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey all...

I'm back. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I created a post a few weeks ago asking advice on a decent solo character after I wasn't a fan of Enchanter's play style. I was a lot of helpful suggestion, and whittled it down to either a Necro or a Druid.

I recently got both to the high teens, and haven't really enjoyed either. Necro I mainly didn't like because I just don't like Iksar, despite trying to, and I felt super squishy. Druid was fine, but again, I felt really squishy and the solo style was very similar to Enchanter (charming), which I am not a fan of. I know I can quad kite when I get higher, but I don't want to play a character until level 34 or whatever before I know whether or not I'll enjoy them. I also couldn't get over the fact that for times when I don't want to solo, neither class is that desirable, so grouping would be harder. I have a hard enough time finding a group on my Cleric, so I can't imagine how hard it is for a Druid or Necro.

I think I want to avoid casters. I feel like I've given them a decent shot since I've tried three now up to the late teens, and I'm just not sure it's for me.

Now that Velious will be out soon, and the exp penalties are hopefully going away, I think I'd like to try a hybrid. I like the idea of being in plate, so I can take more damage, as well as being able to melee, which I think would be closer to my playstyle. I'm avoiding monk because as this is more of a first character, the weight restrictions would affect my ability to get money, and their gear seems pretty expensive.

Few questions, I guess.

1. From what I've read, SK is better at Paladin at soloing and tanking. Is it even worth considering a Paladin?

2. I have about 600pp. I imagine I should prioritize those 55hp/5ac rings, but that would eat up pretty much all my money. Is that still smart to do?

3. How do hybrids deal with not being able to bind themselves? Do you just shout for binds until someone finds one?

4. Finally, I put Bard in there because I know they can solo well, but probably are more akin to a caster, since they don't really melee. Would they be worth trying over a Paladin or SK? I just feel like I see so many Bards running around.

I don't know what I want to do. I'm sick of doing the 1 - 20 grind just to find a character. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thanks for the help again!

First, I wouldn't discount monks. The weight thing really doesn't matter til later, and a lot of really good monk gear is cheap.

1) Pal/SK both fine, just play what you like. Both hold aggro better than 9 out of 10 Warriors on this server. Paladins bring less to the table though IMO.

2) 5ac/55hp rings all the way. For 600-650pp you should be able to get Rings+Sword of Skyfire if you go SK/Pal, Rings+Saiyn's Claw if Bard. Later pick up Crested Mistmoore Shield+Banded/Bronze, then upgrade to quest armor.

3) Its really easy to find someone to bind you, unless its a weird zone like NK or FoB.

4) Bards solo better than the knights, but usually/hopefully aren't tanking. You can swarm-(diaf), charm-, chant- or fear-kite, so plenty of options. Great Crowd control class, which you don't really see in most MMOs.

If you're looking for solo/utility role in groups, go Bard. If you're looking to tank in groups/solo sometimes, go SK. If you want to tank in groups/hate yourself solo, go Paladin.

[cries4hardcore]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

didn't read, SK or bard.

Never play a paladin for any reason, they are terrible for everything in every scenario no matter what.

(my personal opinion as I hate paladins and refuse to group with or help them in anyway, carry on)

I get this way when people suggest inviting a Druid to the group

[Danth]

Originally Posted by Crawdad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pal/SK both fine, just play what you like. Both hold aggro better than 9 out of 10 Warriors on this server.

...And the 10th only looks good because he's taunting off a Paladin or Shadow Knight.

Danth

[Frug]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't hate you,

yet!

I guess its the hipster in me, if its popular I don't like it. Just gotta go against the grain.

if DE's could be paladins... I don't think id play here

Unfortunately it's now popular to be a hipster.