Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-04-2010, 12:21 AM
Noleafclover Noleafclover is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noraa3903 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Will have to disagree. The shaman would bring more to the table having slows and tossing on poison dots to help burn down the mob quicker. Not to mention at later levels the addition of the pet would allow for much speedier kills then what the cleric would bring. Faster the mob dies less you have to heal anyway not to mention the slow decreases the damage the mage pet would sustain tremendously. I think shaman is a complete better partner for a mage over a cleric.
Noooo don't slow ~ The damage shield... noooooo

You may be right though, never tried it. Just love lull, prolly too much.

unrelated

Lots of people are like - mages are great, why not have two! 2 mages still = 1 fire pet taking hits.

Mage is the worst duo class for mage other than a melee. Other classes bring other utility, 2nd mage just brings greatly weakened dps. If you want that, take a wizzie. You at least get root/snare/ports there.
__________________
Accersitus Mage
Ennui Monk
Vita mid 40s Cleric
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.