Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 02-18-2014, 01:01 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
2 guilds that wanted PvE and 1 guild that wanted to kill people. It was obviously going to be a 2 v 1 any way you look at it. I personally believe if RD sided with Azrael they would have gotten 0 targets in fear, along with Nihilum.

RD and Nihilum both benefited in that fight. Azrael isn't as diplomatic and refuses to give at all. RD had to choose a side and either choice makes them look bad to someone. Choosing to side with Azrael to help get rid of Nihilum and then being slaughtered by Azrael and get nothing out of it would be demoralizing and very frustrating to RD members. Siding with Nihilum to help them while helping RD as well feels slimy but some progress is gained. Either decision sucks. Azrael or Nihilum were going to come out on top in that fight while RD hangs in the middle somewhere.
this guy gets it. siding with az to then fight it to the death means RD is prolly losing, and then becomes a feeder guild to azrael instantly. while people from RD will still join nihilum on occasion, azrael was ACTIVELY recruiting our members via texts / phone calls, etc.
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle"
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.