Here's your chance to influence LnS

[Bokke]

Just a suggestion, is it necessary to have all the grey area when dealing with zones.
Wouldn't it be a lot easier if a call for LNS from one side means that side can no longer engage who they were fighting for 1 hour, regardless of zones?

[k9quaint]

Originally Posted by Herb9 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All I want to know is who spanked you that you are now considering input? You've abused position, shown terrible incompetence in understanding real pnp vs baiting and rule lawyering, and now you are admitting that the original rules were both poorly reviewed and not at all researched.

You owe anyone you suspended or banned under the previous rules an apology and reprieve.

You should keep your ego in check and pay less attention to server politics, if you wish to give the impression of impartiality.

Why hasn't this guild been disbanded for repeated violations of GM & forum rules?

[Silent]

Originally Posted by Rellapse36 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol nilly

lol red dawn, see i can do it too. You haven't been on red long enough to experience real pvp, you got PL'd straight to 60 and rarely if ever encountered pvp while leveling.

as for LNS rules I agree with gongshows OP

[Rallyd]

Originally Posted by Gongshow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just make this the rule for everything (small scale, and mass) and we have ourselves a winner.

Logical LNS 2014! Halfway there!

This sounds much more simple.

You want LNS? Ask and ye shall receive, no bullshit.

Punishments for LNS offenses NEEEEEED to be black and white, not "whatever the GM decides based on what guild tag you have"

Suggestion : First offense - 3 days suspension. Second offense - 7 days suspension Third offense - 3 strikes your out - 30 days suspension

Players should never ever be banned from a server for a LNS violation, it is a core principle of a pvp server.

[k9quaint]

Originally Posted by Rallyd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TPunishments for LNS offenses NEEEEEED to be black and white, not "whatever the GM decides based on what guild tag you have"

Nizzar said this:

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We will not let anyone LNS in a zone or any adjacent zone of a raid mob if its coming up anytime soon.

Then GM said this:

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Then Nizzar gonna get fuckin banned.

Then Nizzar violated PnP.
Then Nizzar got suspended.
That is pretty black and white that Nizzar should have been banned like the GM said, but I am ok with him showing mercy and changing it to a suspension. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Rellapse36]

Originally Posted by Silent [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You haven't been on red long enough to experience real pvp, you got PL'd straight to 60 and rarely if ever encountered pvp while leveling.

ya I just didn't lvl a monk to 60 with no PL moran

[Cyrax>]

Originally Posted by Gongshow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just make this the rule for everything (small scale, and mass) and we have ourselves a winner.

Logical LNS 2014! Halfway there!

Best Option and cant get any Simpler

[k9quaint]

Originally Posted by Littlegyno 10.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

should be a set guideline. violation #1- 3 days, violation 2- 7 days, etc etc.

as of right now, you could mq on the blue server,lose a few levels and be back, but pvp on a red server and kill somebody on lns,permaban.

There should be a warning stage, for players who are back from a break and have encountered the rules, etc. Maybe at GM's discretion, meaning if you got a warning you know you are on the hot seat and should regulate your behavior.

[Rallyd]

No, there can be no GM discretion in enforcement of rules, GM's cannot be put in a position to be bias'ed. This is absolutely unacceptable.

[k9quaint]

Originally Posted by Rallyd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, there can be no GM discretion in enforcement of rules, GM's cannot be put in a position to be bias'ed. This is absolutely unacceptable.

I think everyone understands that you are least likely to receive any discretion from GMs on any issue. Since you are unlikely to benefit from any interaction with GMs you prefer that others get banned instead of warned.

The server would benefit from GMs banning less people and warning more, and I would place the health of the server ahead of satisfying the needs of one angry forumquestor.