What happened to the days where rep mattered and the players upheld the rules

[Tune]

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Classic amount of grief is exactly what people should expect on Project 1999 and that is what the PnP rules were meant to do. Unfortunately we don't have GMs on all the time to look at every situation. Corpse camping was illegal on live and would be dealt with.

The PnP was a bandaid to help enforce a classic Everquest environment without the use of GMs investing their time. Guild leaders couldn't step up and help govern these rules without them being "server rules" so we are stuck with a bad solution. It will evolve in time but there is no reason to complain about it. Best thing people do is not act like assholes.

There is so much talk about bans on this server. Did anyone even get a real ban besides Tune? A guy who has broken rules on this server since day one. It had little to do with the PnP and much to do with everything else.

wtf have i done dawg

ur linking me with an old account isnt even fair

[Sektor]

Tune you're getting real bad since the ban of your bard. Just remake a new bard and get it over with.

[Tune]

Originally Posted by Sektor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tune you're getting real bad since the ban of your bard. Just remake a new bard and get it over with.

why bother if my name is sullied over stupid stuff in the past no matter what i do.

id rather spam these boards with shitty forum questing until my fingers bleed

trolls aint winning shit, ill continue to fight for my guild on here and on random toons in game

[Colgate]

shut up fag

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by Bokke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What game was this because it sure as hell was not the EverQuest I was playing.
Discordia/Indig/Pande corpse camped each other on TZ at least weekly.

Edit: Sorry this came across as snarky. I legitimately don't recall corpse camping being illegal, and if it was no one cared.

If you /petitioned or a GM saw you corpse camping you would be dealt with, just like this server has been for the last 3 weeks. There weren't clear LnS rules back then because GMs were always present and would just deal with it. If you and some rival killed each other on corpse runs over and over so be it, as it is on project 1999. The LnS rules only apply if at least one party wants to enforce it.

The fact that Nirgon remembers this as well should be enough evidence enough.

[HippoNipple]

Ashlanne wrote:
Here is the response from CS regarding the policies..

Of course everything depends on if we can prove their intentions or witness the actions in some way, so our response will be somewhat situational. With that said, the situation(s) that this person described would be handled as follows:
If raid X had yet to engage in the encounter, the raid should find a PvP solution.
If both raid X and Y engage simultaneously, they should find a PvP solution.
If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did not have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, we will enforce the PnP.
If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, raid X should find a PvP solution.
If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y by training, we will enforce the PnP.
I think that the rule "Characters will not lose experience when killed in PvP combat, under most circumstances, although the occasional loss of experience is to be expected." refers to the fact that a necro DoT, fall damage, or a Mage pet could kill you and you would lose exp (or any other factor). The lack of experience loss is not guaranteed.

There were no changes in the Rallos ruleset except the name of the server.”

There is a quote from EQ classic forums about Rallos zek. How would you like it if players couldn't even engage each other on here if another guild was already attacking a raid mob!

Compared to other games out there EQ was hardcore but people have a foggy memory of what the game was actually like and mold it into something way more hardcore than it was. Then they get upset if they can't nerd rage on people in this emulator server.

[Mac Dretti]

Tldr

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by Mac Dretti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tldr

Too long can't read.

[heartbrand]

If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did not have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, we will enforce the PnP.

that is the magical rule that needs to be in play here.

[chu]

ffa