35+ server seems crowded...

[Virtuosos]

WOO glad to know there are a few oklahomans here

[Zubek]

Originally Posted by Virtuosos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

WOO glad to know there are a few oklahomans here

I live in Moore and work on the North side of OKC.

[yaeger]

Too many solo players, just join a nice group and take a spot. Haven't noticed too many groups 35+.

Personally, I see no problem with a full group stealing a camp from a solo player. Especially when they can't kill all the mobs at the camp in a short amount of time.

I think the server camping rules support that.

[azeth]

Originally Posted by yaeger [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Personally, I see no problem with a full group stealing a camp from a solo player.

wha?

support your local mages! and necros!

[yaeger]

I saw this all the time at lower levels. An example would be a full group of people able and willing to move their group into Crushbone Throneroom, but the Throneroom was being camped by someone farming belts/pads/Emperor Crush and not getting any exp from it.

I see no problem with the group eligible to camp the room when it's within their level range.

I'm sure you can call that 'stealing'. In most cases the farmer will give up rights to the room if someone has a legitimate reason to kill the mobs there.

However, in the cases the farmer refuses to leave, I see nothing wrong with the group moving in and 'stealing' the camp.

[Anaiyah]

Originally Posted by yaeger [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I saw this all the time at lower levels. An example would be a full group of people able and willing to move their group into Crushbone Throneroom, but the Throneroom was being camped by someone farming belts/pads/Emperor Crush and not getting any exp from it.

I see no problem with the group eligible to camp the room when it's within their level range.

I'm sure you can call that 'stealing'. In most cases the farmer will give up rights to the room if someone has a legitimate reason to kill the mobs there.

However, in the cases the farmer refuses to leave, I see nothing wrong with the group moving in and 'stealing' the camp.

Just for comedy, Id like to hear your objective reasoning on what constitutes a legitimate reason to be at a camp, and what does not.

[yaeger]

Originally Posted by Anaiyah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just for comedy, Id like to hear your objective reasoning on what constitutes a legitimate reason to be at a camp, and what does not.

You're acting like 'legitimate' is a yes or no checkbox. However, there are levels of priority when you're determining camps. Groups generally have priority over soloer's. Players that can gain experience will generally have priority over those that can't at a camp.

The most important thing isn't just strolling in and taking whatever you want though. Ask, compromise, barter with the players. If you're in a group of level 45's and you want to camp the assassin room where a level 50 is camping for whatever reason, ask.

In the above example the group of 45's would have a more legitimate purpose to camp the room, as they'd be able to kill all of the mobs both in and below. But that doesn't mean that they can pick any ONE room and kick any soloer out.

Now let's say that the entire zone of LGuk is camped by level 50 players who are there for whatever reason. I see no problem with the experience group asking for a camp, or taking one if no one gives one up.

Obviously this isn't the case if there's 5 lvl 50's and 1 lvl 45 in group. Duo's or trios don't count either. PLers can go fuck themselves.

If they're farming an item and you want to move in, maybe offer to give the farmer the item if it drops.

[Amra]

Problem with that is a high level mage can outdps most groups even if they are close in level ranges. Nerf Pets!