OFFICIAL PROPOSAL from FE/TMO

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Half and half is not middle ground? Are you kidding me? And you are on the rotation section of Divinity's proposal. It gives TMO+FE+IB as group 2/3 of the mobs every month weekly . . which is more than half.

I am honestly not sure how to talk to you.

To be fair, I'm going to explain my mindset a little bit more.

You are assuming that BDA and Taken will never get a mob on the other two weeks of the month. They already do now. They lock down Vox and Inny. BDA beat us to Talendor just yesterday. And we were more than happy about it. Because that's what we've wanted to see. Another guild at least trying. They could have had Sev easily if their FTEer had hit him first, pure coinflip. BDA got FTE on Druushk and got him to 50%, with one more bard he'd have probably been dead. Taken got last VS. These guilds are more than capable of competing, they have been for a long while. And now they are starting to actually try. These past two weeks have guilds trying things they didn't in the past, and they're going to keep trying and getting better. While TMO has only gotten weaker. This server could get very interesting very soon.

You know what you're overlooking about all these different agreements? We (tmo and fe/IB) are not allowed to compete with other guilds on their time, while they are absolutely allowed to compete with us. We could break up with IB, or BDA could step up onto our tier, or TMO could fucking shut us down and we don't get anything. It's not just 2 or 3 guilds sharing for those two weeks, more competition can appear for us. In short, we aren't guaranteed any number of mobs like you seem to think. And frankly I'm fine with that as long as we have a chance to get a decent number, and two weeks is not enough. That's why I don't like Divinity's proposal. Because it kills competition instead of foster it.