Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #341  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:45 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

This shitty proposal kind of did it to itself to be honest.

One system is fair, unbiased, and easy to police. The other system clearly favors the top end and is overly convoluted and full of problems. You can decide which.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #342  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:45 PM
goshozal goshozal is offline
Sarnak

goshozal's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 242
Default

I figured out what was wrong with this proposal. No spreadsheets. Gotta have spreadsheets.
  #343  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:46 PM
Hailto Hailto is offline
Planar Protector

Hailto's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,497
Default

Just give BDA/Taken the ability to GM spawn no drop items and be done with it. They can get their pixels and the rest of the server can have fun competing.
__________________
Blue:
[60 Oracle] Kaludar (Barbarian)
[35 Enchanter] Droxzn (Skeleton)
[XX Rogue] Hailto (Half-Elf)
Red:
[21 Wizard] Hailto (Dark-Elf)
  #344  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:46 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

There ya go.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #345  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:46 PM
Scoresby Scoresby is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't have time to read your entire thread. But you're basically proposing that AG and TMO both have 100 points right? Are you flexible on this? Somewhere in this giant thread do you say that it's actually fair for TMO to have more like..400? That would lead me to believe your proposal could actually make sense.
Are you being dense on purpose? Every guild gets the same amount of points, but not every guild will get kills to use up their points. It merely forces guilds to focus on targets that matter to them. You still would have to out compete everyone for the raid target, just can't exceed your point limit by killing any and everything. It's pretty damned simple.

The reward you get for being top tier is the best items, but the concession is the raid scene opens to a significantly larger playerbase....which was a requirement of the agreement to begin with.
  #346  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:46 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This shitty proposal kind of did it to itself to be honest.

One system is fair, unbiased, and easy to police. The other system clearly favors the top end and is overly convoluted and full of problems. You can decide which.
I still don't see how its fair that those who put in the most time and effort get allotted the same amount of mobs as those who choose to put in very little.
  #347  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:46 PM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pheer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And just as alterations to address those concerns began being discussed everyone started raging about how shitty they felt the proposal was and demanding everyone focus on this point system or else they'll refuse to cooperate.
nobody is refusing to compromise. unless in your mind not agreeing with this current proposal is a complete refusal to compromise. that's really reaching
  #348  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:47 PM
Pheer Pheer is offline
Fire Giant

Pheer's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't think they understand yet that point system will never be the majority either. People are going to have to meet in the middle. NO ONE is going to get EVERYTHING they want here.


I don't understand why people have such a hardon for this point system. Its still possible for most of the casual guilds to never see a VS, Trak, or CT kill ever again depending on the more hardcore guilds' mob priority. Especially if IB/FE ever decided to part ways amidst such a system. Also what stops players from hardcore guilds apping their lesser known alts into other guilds for additional chances at loot once their main guild is done cleaning out their priority targets? Stealin and Derubael were debating about core groups of raiders splintering off from guilds to game the system when all they really have to do is slip their alts into a guild like BDA/Taken/Divinity and invest their time in whichever guild is after the most targets on that player's personal priority list.

What if for example draco is on low priority for a lot of guilds and one guild in particular has made it one of their main focuses to get as many BCGs as possible. Why not just app a caster alt into that guild and try to score a BCG for my main eventually since my main guild isnt prioritizing that mob anymore?
  #349  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:47 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pheer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And just as alterations to address those concerns began being discussed everyone started raging about how shitty they felt the proposal was and demanding everyone focus on this point system or else they'll refuse to cooperate.
I have not been doing this, and I think any thread in server chat was doomed to failure regardless.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #350  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:47 PM
Happyfeet Happyfeet is offline
Sarnak

Happyfeet's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'll tell you what, give me a limited access GM account and I'll police 80% of the raids for Rogean/Sirken.

I have the free time again for the next few months, more than enough to get the new system rolling, and when I see it take place I'll forward it to Sirken.

After shady people like Happyfeet are banned on all his shady ass mains/alts, we can finally move forward with the non raid rule circumventing shitbags.
Wow, who have you become? I was giving a good example of how to get around that shitbag idea and you call me shady? Go back to RNF Stealin. It's a terrible plan with no way to implement it. Call me whatever you want, but I can read a bad idea when I see one paaaaaaal.
__________________
-Happyfeets/Crappyfeet/Crackyfeet/Abraham, TMO
The Plague of Fennin Ro
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.