Proposition For Raid Rules - Input Requested

[Yinikren]

I am in favor of TMO not setting demands the rest of the server will not agree to.

You guys figure out how to work 6 guilds into a mix.

[Ungriim]

Originally Posted by Fazlazen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

16% of the mobs to the scum, 84% to IB/FE/TMO... Is VP counted in that? What do you mean by remains FTE... Everything else isnt?

16% to the scum sounds fair tho, its how it is given to them that needs to be talked over.

Vp is FTE (assume TMO/IBFE competition)

3 weeks a month is TMO/IBFE in rotation on rotation assuming no outside guilds compete

1 week a month TMO/IBFE take break from classic/kunark and let other guilds duke it out

[Ungriim]

Sorry typos drunk in Vegas

[Fazlazen]

Originally Posted by Ungriim [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Vp is FTE (assume TMO/IBFE competition)

3 weeks a month is TMO/IBFE in rotation on rotation assuming no outside guilds compete

1 week a month TMO/IBFE take break from classic/kunark and let other guilds duke it out

sounds good, but why does TMO/IBFE rotate?

And during your 1 week break for the casual scum to partake in raiding, is VP also a no go?

If VP remains a go, I think we have a potential winner here.

[Yinikren]

Casuals raiding once a week isn't an option. People shouldn't have to go on vacation for 3 weeks when their raiding is done to fit you guys in.

A weekly schedule that moderates mob intake would be cleaner, less confusing, wouldn't fuck people out of town on business, and be easier to police. You guys just don't like it cause you don't get 75% of the mobs. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ungriim]

Originally Posted by Fazlazen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

sounds good, but why does TMO/IBFE rotate?

And during your 1 week break for the casual scum to partake in raiding, is VP also a no go?

If VP remains a go, I think we have a potential winner here.

It assumes rotation with the 2 hour wait period - but other guilds are welcome to try.

VP is not included. Anyone can try to kill a dragon in vp at any time.

To the guy that posted above...it needs to be compromise - Real raiders aren't going to give up as much as you want. Also they don't have to go on vacation - they have always and will always be allowed to compete

[Joroz]

re-pops wont fix anything.... look back at the history of them, one guild logs in alts kills a target then logs in another set of alts over and over till most of the re-pop is dead, then they go play in their playground that they have cock blocked away from the rest of the server for 3 years, rarely does any guild mobilize fast enough to beat the army's of alts camped at each mobs engage spot, sure they may get mobs left up that drop shitty bracers or wt reducing bags but nothing good. all your doing with re-pops is increasing the fun level for those that keep getting most of everything, rules of engagement need to be adjusted to curb this behavior. this type of encounter lock down is not and has never been part of classic eq experience.

[Fael]

Even with alts, the last few repops have seen a fair distribution. If repops are during prime time with adequate notice, it's your own fault if you come away empty handed.

[williestargell]

one thing that comes from the GM end would be more repops. Repops by definition give everyone a chance at kills, you can only be in one place at a time. Guilds have backed off on repop days due to not being willing to put up with being trained and otherwise abused. If there's assurance that misdeeds wont happen or will be punished then several more guilds will be involved on those days.

More repops is better and has been semi-promised for a long time

[kotton05]

guilds can kill vs, trak and prolly fay at same time