Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #391  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:31 AM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

I'll make a thread when I get off of work tonight outlining the revised weighted points system I could work on. Other people with their ideas can do the same. Only pertinent thoughts to the idea posted should be said in the thread, so it doesn't get spammed to nowhere fast. This way people don't have to wade through 43 pages of discussion to find the ideas being discussed.

I encourage everyone else to make their own threads about their ideas for a fix so the conversations can be kept separate and clean.

It'll probably be a few days before we get everyone discussing things in a vent server. TMOs leader is out of town and I still want to post in my own guilds forums as well and get their input. I am not the spokesperson, I just remodeled Xastens bag idea into something that sounds good to me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
Last edited by Yinikren; 12-28-2013 at 12:34 AM..
  #392  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:31 AM
Ravager Ravager is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,731
Default

I wonder if all the raiding guilds agreed that TMO shouldn't have raid mobs for 2 years, to balance the scales as it were, that Rogean would enforce that?
  #393  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:31 AM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

I realize, was being facetious =D So in real terms who does that mean?

IB, FE, TMO, AG, Taken, Europa, BDA, Div, knights who say ni, doljon...? Because I mean, people who haven't even started at a target would want to vote if a rotation is a real option. Lots of people haven't raided on this server due to the difficulty of it. With even more people trying to go for the same few targets, it'll only compound the problems for most of the guilds.
  #394  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:33 AM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I wonder if all the raiding guilds agreed that TMO shouldn't have raid mobs for 2 years, to balance the scales as it were, that Rogean would enforce that?
I'd imagine the rules would have to be universal. But he just might :P
  #395  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:35 AM
Autotune Autotune is offline
Planar Protector

Autotune's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 2,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I realize, was being facetious =D So in real terms who does that mean?

IB, FE, TMO, AG, Taken, Europa, BDA, Div, knights who say ni, doljon...? Because I mean, people who haven't even started at a target would want to vote if a rotation is a real option. Lots of people haven't raided on this server due to the difficulty of it. With even more people trying to go for the same few targets, it'll only compound the problems for most of the guilds.
What I imagine, or what I'd think the staff would do, is have a discussion with the main guilds that wish to participate. They'd all have a voice towards what system they would like to put forward. The staff and guilds would then hash out the best implementation of that system and then put it into effect.

The staff are the ones who should say which guilds do an don't have a voice in this as every guild would have their own agenda behind their reasons to include/exclude guilds.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
I like to ninja edit people's Sigs.
  #396  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:37 AM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What I imagine, or what I'd think the staff would do, is have a discussion with the main guilds that wish to participate. They'd all have a voice towards what system they would like to put forward. The staff and guilds would then hash out the best implementation of that system and then put it into effect.

The staff are the ones who should say which guilds do an don't have a voice in this as every guild would have their own agenda behind their reasons to include/exclude guilds.
Mm hmm. I'm just trying to figure out where the balance would lie if a vote of all available options were taken depending on who was brought to the table. Certainly less hectic than it is now, but how much so? It's all just conjecture, but it does make me wonder.
  #397  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:38 AM
Autotune Autotune is offline
Planar Protector

Autotune's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 2,470
Default

I'd hope that the staff/rogean wouldn't say raid guilds and then only include the well established raid guilds when they want to effectively make the raid scene available to everyone. The biased top enders will only look out for themselves while throwing a bone to the people who aren't tagged with them and the ones at the bottom will want the top guys to cut their right arm, left leg, and both nuts off to satisfy their thirst.


aka, need a good representation from the top, middle, and bottom or you need to just include everyone.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
I like to ninja edit people's Sigs.
  #398  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:40 AM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

Let's talk meeting in another couple days. So many people are still out of town for the holidays (myself included) and consequently haven't given this the attention it deserves.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #399  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:42 AM
Magicant Magicant is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 50
Default

We would be more than happy to talk/discuss with any of the guild leaders about the issues in the raid scene moving forward. If you would like to use our vent I would be more than happy to facilitate it. If you would like this you can PM me or tell me in game, just ask any IB member if I am on. There is no yelling or childish acting however and it will be limited to ~2 members that have authority to make decisions for their guild.

I would prefer the server staff be involved if they are going to be enforcing this. I think in order to support so many guilds in this community the staff would need to join us to discuss changing the mob spawn mechanics (IE repops, lowers variance etc)

Please create a private forum and give access to only the leadership so the staff can weigh in and we can have a discussion. I do not believe these 50 page public threads are productive.

I am currently unsure regarding who the leadership of the TMO organization currently is. I got 5 different answers from their members when just asking randomly.

Swarws
  #400  
Old 12-28-2013, 12:44 AM
Troubled Troubled is offline
Sarnak

Troubled's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Let's talk meeting in another couple days. So many people are still out of town for the holidays (myself included) and consequently haven't given this the attention it deserves.
Fair enough. Until then, we'll continue to confine and refine ideas.
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.