![]() |
|
#341
|
|||
|
Planar guilds are raids. But not competiton. Nobody races to fear to get those darn frightfingers! Those can and should be dictated by your guild.
__________________
![]() Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee | ||
|
|
|||
|
#342
|
|||||
|
Quote:
There is a different between adding strategy to what you choose to take out each week and adding a punishment for wanting to kill a target. Basically, you want it so each week a guild's wants may or may not change based on what is available or what the guild's wants/needs are. Odds are that most of the time a guild will have left over points and leaving other less wanted targets up instead of killing them for the hell of it which will give other guilds a chance to take out that target. Now add that if a target is left up for 4hours or more it becomes a free target with no cost associated.
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#343
|
||||
|
Quote:
the problem is Velious never came out so we coudl not "Move on yet" | |||
|
|
||||
|
#344
|
||||
|
Quote:
-Point system seems to have the most rolling support so far. -Rotations haven't even been mentioned have they? Because you can't know when a mob will spawn and who can really kill it in a reasonable time despite adding themselves to the list/hard to maintain I guess. -Opting out of certain numbers of spawns after killing one is cool, but point system kinda takes care of that across the board. I'm still looking for something to make sure that VS isn't rotated weekly between TMO and FE/IB, so a weekly point system that allows VS with multiple other spawns is kind of weak atm.
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#345
|
||||
|
Quote:
Do you think the "big raid" guilds wouldn't like the weighted method due to even less raids per month? By default I am already removing 14 raids they were getting before. I didnt want to seem COMPLETELY out of line and come from a position of "you can only do 15 of 58 boss mobs a month".
__________________
![]() Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee | |||
|
|
||||
|
#346
|
|||
|
I like monthly. I think it adds more gamesmanship quality. And the variance spikes would even out better.
And just because us nerds are talking about it ddoesn't mean it is getting any support by the guilds ^_^
__________________
![]() Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee | ||
|
|
|||
|
#347
|
||||
|
I am sure most guilds will jump at the opportunity just to raid - if FE and TMO want to spend half of their alloted points each week on VS then that's just fewer mobs they are taking each week as a result.
__________________
Quote:
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT. Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard | |||
|
|
||||
|
#348
|
||||
|
This system does seem to have a lot of support - details just need to be hammered out and everyone needs to agree on how it should be run. Literally the only things it needs to get started are a raid forum to decide on points costs for mobs. We can also push for the removal or reduction of variance with we can procure enough evidence that it would no longer help the server.
__________________
Quote:
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT. Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard | |||
|
|
||||
|
#349
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
![]() | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#350
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|