Dear Atheist,

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm sorry. I don't think the chronically unemployed, man-children are allowed an opinion when it comes to the adults talking about jobs HBB. Just sit in your little hovel in Watts or Englewood or wherever it is your housing benefits permit you to live, and suck the tit of the Govt. while the Men have a discussion.

I found a new favorite poster while Gotrocks is on hiatus.

[r00t]

Pretty sure the mathematical properties that govern the stability of our universe are proof enough that creation was not an accident. DNA databases and the complex systems they confer is like cherry on top of the proverbial cake. Eat it atheists

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]



All that education and you still have an utterly moronic worldview, weighing in with the most uneducated opinions. It's embarrassing.

Ok, one last one, then I will be off. So your argument for evolution, and against God is a photo of a family with Achondroplasia? That is your argument, and you say I am coming from a place of uneducated opinions? That means nothing. You might as well have put up a photo of a pencil or a phone. What does that even mean? I have an idea, but I want you to put together an intelligent thought and convey it here, for us to see. This thought needs to come from a place of "educated opinions". You, my friend, are embarrassing. Later all!

[Lune]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty sure the mathematical properties that govern the stability of our universe are proof enough that creation was not an accident. DNA databases and the complex systems they confer is like cherry on top of the proverbial cake. Eat it atheists

All this talk of eating, cake, cherries on top of things. You been spending too much time with tralina?

[r00t]

it is impossible to calculate the entropy of even a small amount of segments of hydrocarbons naturally forming into a dna strand.

then why the randomness to have a mechanism to self replicate? youre defying common sense

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well obviously you guys are too "scientifically minded" to understand English. Refer to my post that differentiated hard and soft sciences. And explain to me how physiology, anatomy, pathophysiology, and organic chemistry are not "hard' sciences. Hard sciences=natural, soft sciences=social. If you are not sure what those words mean, look them up.

I never said that the sciences that I am taking are as difficult as the ones you are leading me to believe you have taken (although I feel you haven't taken them either...and there is no reason for me to do so to begin with. I could guarantee I would ace them however.), but to try and make fun of someone for bettering themselves in life by ripping on the classes they are taking for a chosen major is really, really pathetic. Just saying.

Holy shit you are a defensive little prick, aren't you. I never ripped on your nursing degree. My brother has a nursing degree, so I'm hardly biased against them. I was just saying that thinking nursing is some kind of hard science is laughable, and doesn't add legitimacy to your opinion on evolution, which you implied it did. The hardness of a science is not a simple true/false value, but a continuum. Yes, there are sciences far softer than the biological sciences, but there are many that are much harder. Your degree is somewhere in between. Calling it a hard science is a bit misleading and pretentious.

Also, I thought people who believed in god were supposed to be humble? Don't they still teach humility at church? How does a sentence like "I could guarantee I would ace them however." fit in with that? I'll tell you how it fits in. It shows you are incredibly ignorant of a great part of this world, evolution being just one small area of your ignorance. I'm sure that in the realm of poli sci, you always did well to pretend you knew more than you did. That's not gonna fly in your new career. So please correct this tendency before you get people killed.

[r00t]

the big bang theory doesnt even explain existence as you atheists naturally go to to explain genesis. It simply gives definition of measurable time being a side effect of matter. You can still talk philosophically about immeasurable time, ie. what was there in the infinity before the bang

[kylok]

many lulz in this thread. Hate to burst your bubble Boggwin but you're only at the tip of the iceberg of "hard science". Take a few high end physics classes or physical chemistry, where they explain the how and why of you're supposed "intelligent design" then come back to me. Also - modern biology is firmly rooted in Darwinian evolution type logic so I'm not quite sure where you're pulling ID out of any bio class that isn't taught out of the humanities department. I can definitely understand your biased towards the intelligent design view point as you were probably raised with it, and repeatedly reinforce that brainwashing by going to church weekly. That being said, as a scientist, the hypothesis of intelligent design is TERRIBLE fucking science. I'll break it down for you as you clearly do not understand scientific method (what makes science science, as opposed to playing pin the tail on the donkey with origin theories). Hypothesis -> Experiment -> Results. If the results do not agree with the hypothesis you start over, you DO NOT tweak the experiment or fudge the hypothesis a little to match your results. What you have done is observed human biology, done no testing, and concluded that god (purposeful lowercase) made man. This is analogous to me saying look, the moon looks like cheese, I bet the moon is made of cheese, since I lack the knowledge and resources to test my hypothesis, I'll conclude that the moon is made of cheese - since I like cheese. Believe what you will but don't come and try to say that it's anything other than belief (not logic based). Imo stick to poli sci you're probably too old to adjust to mindset properly to do good science.

[r00t]

I still precribe to the theory that we are living in the computer simulation of an advanced species

[kylok]

r00t just stop, you're spouting old ass rhetoric that has generally proven to be false, if you want me to line by line it I will but you can use Google as well as the next ape.