Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-18-2013, 10:42 AM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Visual [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is painfully obvious that you know nothing about the sport, legislature or the business side of things.
Explain? I probably know/have read more about boxing, and UFC isn't so different under the surface. You're sounding like a UFC fanboy that thinks the sport/franchise is above corruption.
Last edited by Swish; 11-18-2013 at 10:45 AM..
  #22  
Old 11-19-2013, 05:49 AM
susvain0362 susvain0362 is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2013
Location: In Bruges
Posts: 352
Default

man relax Korrath. most people dont know much about state athletic commissions/ufc. lets just be happy Swish is a fan of MMA/ufc.

i love bisping. hes one of my favorite fighters. ufc is big in the UK, UFC 43 was there. that was a long time ago. thats when tito ortiz got beat up by lee murray!!! thats gotta be one of the coolest stories of all time
  #23  
Old 11-19-2013, 03:55 PM
Toehammer Toehammer is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theguyy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Anyone comparing this decision to Jones v Gus is beyond retarded.
Although Jones/Gustafsson was a closer fight, both fights reeked of poor judging. However, both challengers made the (mental) mistake of fading in the fifth round, whether intentional (Hendricks) or not (Gustafsson).

Immediately after Jones/Gustafsson I thought, ok wow, Jones met his match and lost fairly convincingly, although I thought he would win a rematch with a grappling-centric change of gameplan. After Hendricks I thought, oh my... GSP has got nothing for Hendricks, now or ever.

Despite all of this, both matches were close enough such that neither one was a robbery, but both were surprises that had me saying, "Who the f*ck are these judges?"
  #24  
Old 11-19-2013, 07:17 PM
Nune Nune is offline
Fire Giant

Nune's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 692
Default

Well known amongst the UFC Fighters and their related circles you will NOT win a belt off of scorecards.
__________________
Itap <Super Friends> - Officer | Mentor | Boner | (ded again for now)
Maybach Music - <Imaginary Friends>
  #25  
Old 11-20-2013, 12:42 AM
Toehammer Toehammer is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well known amongst the UFC Fighters and their related circles you will NOT win a belt off of scorecards.
Velasquez vs. Dos Santos 2, Henderson vs. Edgar, Edgar vs. Penn, I am sure there are more... all I can remember right now.

Edgar's fights were even closer than Gus/Jones or GSP/Hendricks.

Definitely hard to take a belt by decision, but has happened several times.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.