Best one sentence summation of how I feel, ever.

[Lron]

Get a fucking life fagatob, holy christ you are an embarrassment.

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Self-replicating molecules were made obsolete billions of years ago by the very lifeforms they led to. Significant progress has been made in engineering such molecules, despite having no direct information on how they functioned in nature.

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/sh...her-rna-e.html

We'll get there eventually. No credible scientists deny it is possible.

The law of biogenesis was relevant when we first began to understand the concept of the cell. It was developed by Louis Pasteur in 1865. It was hypothesized before we had the slightest understanding of molecular biology or understood any molecular basis for evolution.

Yes, I am telling you that Chihuahua evolved from wolves. Scientific fact, look it up.

Um molecular biology proves evolution to be impossible even according to Darwin himself. The systems which operate on the molecular level of an organism all have to co-exist simultaneously for them to work. There is no way anything could evolve one piece at a time because the organism would be incapable of surviving long enough for it to teach itself all of the proper things it needs to propagate.

Regardless of when Pasteur devised his theory, it still stands true. Last I checked, it's still a scientific law and has not been changed or altered or revoked since the day it was created. In fact, all science has done is confirm his findings even more. Cell theory is entirely based on the original work of Pasteur. Guess what, cell theory is still a fact, verifiable and provable every day of the week. Evolution cannot be verified nor tested, nor seen by anyone. You literally have to have faith in evolution being true because of this fact. Also, because of this fact, evolution is literally pseudo-science by the very definition of the word. Anything that cannot be tested or experimentally reproduced cannot be scientific.

[Illuzionz]

Also, LOL at the comments section of that article you linked. The RNA molecule can't even fully replicate itself. Not to mention that only DNA can create a living organism. RNA on it's own is useless. RNA based organisms such as a virus require a DNA based host to infect in order to come alive.

Nobody in the world claims that "An amoeba will turn into a frog.".

For the umpteenth time, that's now how evolution works or what it's about.

Yes it is you fucking retard. If that's not how evolution works then how the fuck can you go from one species to another? Where the fuck did frogs come from then? If no frogs existed at one point then obviously something that wasn't a frog eventually turned into one. If shit started off as single celled organisms then you're saying an amoeba or something like an amoeba eventually became that frog. That's exactly what evolution is claiming to have occurred. This is exactly what is complete bullshit and impossible. DNA can only replicate itself. The offspring of any child to their parent has probably around 99.9% similarity in DNA to either parent. Your kids won't grow a pair of fucking gills just because you swim in the water all day like in Waterworld.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If that's not how evolution works then how the fuck can you go from one species to another?

Can you clarify what this "go from one species to another" thing is? That's not what evolution is, you are sadly and disgustingly mistaken. It's not even funny any more.

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where the fuck did frogs come from then? If no frogs existed at one point then obviously something that wasn't a frog eventually turned into one. If shit started off as single celled organisms then you're saying an amoeba or something like an amoeba eventually became that frog. That's exactly what evolution is claiming to have occurred.

No it's not at all, an amoeba doesn't become a frog, I still don't get where you are pulling this leap from and why you're so obsessed with frogs.

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is exactly what is complete bullshit and impossible. DNA can only replicate itself. The offspring of any child to their parent has probably around 99.9% similarity in DNA to either parent. Your kids won't grow a pair of fucking gills just because you swim in the water all day like in Waterworld.

If this is what you think evolution is, thank you for proving my point for me.

[Hastley]

It's cute that this thread makes you neck beards feel educated and smart. Why not go outside of your mothers basements and contribute something to society instead of quoting "articles" from yahoo news

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can you clarify what this "go from one species to another" thing is? That's not what evolution is, you are sadly and disgustingly mistaken. It's not even funny any more.

No it's not at all, an amoeba doesn't become a frog, I still don't get where you are pulling this leap from and why you're so obsessed with frogs.

If this is what you think evolution is, thank you for proving my point for me.

I'm just using frog as an example you complete retard. Lol, seriously? What single celled organism eventually becomes a frog if not an amoeba. You have to pick one because eventually that's the only life that existed at one point. We supposedly according to evolution went from no life, to simplistic life to more complex life. So really we all evolved from an amoeba or some such simple organism. Please take your pick and then explain how you can go from that simple single celled organism to something like a frog or a cat or whatever the fuck.

[Illuzionz]

This guy has to either be retarded or a troll or under the age of 10. I literally have to teach evolutionists/atheists their own theories to them.

Can you clarify what this "go from one species to another" thing is? That's not what evolution is, you are sadly and disgustingly mistaken. It's not even funny any more.

Here let me break it down for you dumb dumb. Where did cats come from? What animal eventually turned into what are known as cats now. Ok now ask the same question for whatever animal you say that cats came from. For instance, DrK said that dogs are descended from wolves. Ok, now where are wolves descended from? Let's just say they're descended from some prehistoric wolf type creature. Ok where is that prehistoric wolf type creature descended from? Eventually if you wind back the clock far enough, you're going to reach a point where no wolf type creature existed anywhere on the planet.

So something had to have eventually become what we now know as a wolf. That's what this "go from one species to another" thing is. If no wolves existed at one point, how the fuck can you go from something that isn't a wolf to something that is, without one species becoming another entirely? Either wolves have always existed or you're telling me that something that wasn't a wolf eventually became one. What the fuck was it, before it became a wolf, and what was that before it became what it is that eventually became a wolf.

[finalgrunt]

dogs are descended from wolves

They do not. They have a common ancestor, and they branched at one point. For the same reason we can't say that Man descends from monkeys. We shared a common ancestor, branched over a very long period of time and evolved seperatly.

So the questions which remain to solve are:

- Do all species descend from the same unicellular ancestor? If so did other different kinds exist but did not survive our ancestor? How many times did life start and vanished before it stuck to the Earth?
- How such material were formed? This is still an ongoing research field, even though we're starting to have a better picture.

For the same reason people were unable (and in some cases still are) unable to explain how we can grow from a single cell with so much differentiation, it will take time to understand the mechanisms. And unlike living cells that we can study at will, we don't have any material to study for our origins. DNA don't survive well through time, and that's the reason why we may see one day Mammoths again, but dinosaurs not so much (until we can actually write DNA code and simulate its output, and then we can build something matching our imagination, which may come close but never will be the reality).

[Gaffin']

NOBODY GIVE A FUCK *****

[Rellapse35]

We all come from black people.