Heres your proof Sloan - Page 17

Skittlez · #**161** 10-26-2013, 10:11 AM

No one 'pays up' on here. The losers will do whatever to find a reason to make the fight and terms agreed on, void.

radditsu · #**162** 10-26-2013, 10:22 AM

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=14DK8PT...%3D14DK8PTl01Y

Its the only way

Ele · #**163** 10-26-2013, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skittlez [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one 'pays up' on here. The losers will do whatever to find a reason to make the fight and terms agreed on, void.

100k? green dragon scale? lol those were joke bets. You took them seriously? Lol on you

Ele · #**164** 10-26-2013, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

100k is a small bet..... Necrious is Scrooge McDuck confirmed... I will be interested in seeing the responses to necrious' post.

Just words, right? Just an opinion, right?

No offense to you. Nec [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Godefroi · #**165** 10-26-2013, 10:45 AM

nobody pays, in the end xerxes murdered sericx, thats all there is to remember

Tanthallas · #**166** 10-26-2013, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Regardless of how stupid a rule is, if everyone agrees on it and then someone breaks it they should own up to it right then and pay out.

The rule clashed with the fact that Sericx wanted Necrious to follow as an observer.

Necrious and I did the best we could to try to make things fair; when we saw that we could not possibly observe, we left and sat at zone in. The point is for them to fight fairly, not to jump on any chance to DQ the other. When the rules are used instrumentally by the players, they do not server their purpose as rules. I wouldnt expect you to understand this anyway pal (=

Tanthallas · #**167** 10-26-2013, 11:11 AM

*server = serve

getsome · #**168** 10-26-2013, 11:25 AM

If people wanted to observe, why not use bind sight?

Alarti0001 · #**169** 10-26-2013, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just words, right? Just an opinion, right?

No offense to you. Nec [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you confused?

Tanthallas · #**170** 10-26-2013, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If people wanted to observe, why not use bind sight?

Sericx wanted Necrious to follow, so I said I would follow such that there would be 1 TMO and 1 FE. Sloan was my choice because he was not KOS, and literally the only thing that could bring him down would be not resisting a fear at 250MR.

In hindsight, bind sight would probably have been the proper course of action.