Heres your proof Sloan

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We will have to agree to disagree and let the jury of RNF cast judgment upon Sericx.

WTB mod to add a poll: Who should receive the 100k winning? A. Sericx B. Xerxes/Sloan.

You have no say.. only the contract has say. 2 people involved and 1 contract.
Popular consensus matters not.

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have no say.. only the contract has say. 2 people involved and 1 contract.

Why are you arguing over this then, would the same not apply to you as well?

Please read up on how defenses to an allegation of breach of contract work.

Popular consensus matters not.

If you say so.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why are you arguing over this then, would the same not apply to you as well?

Please read up on how defenses to an allegation of breach of contract work.



If you say so.

I'm arguing against false claims! Like usual.

[Stinkum]

It's pretty sad that Alarti is still trying to get "last word" in, even when he's been clearly proven to be a bumbling retard.

Kinda reminds me of Harrison.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Stinkum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's pretty sad that Alarti is still trying to get "last word" in, even when he's been clearly proven to be a bumbling retard.

Kinda reminds me of Harrison.

Prove it.

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Prove it.

Fuck you. Go away.

[xmonkx]

Elethia - please see post 25-26.

[Ele]

Originally Posted by xmonkx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elethia - please see post 25-26.

Please have a screen shot of this. It would break the case wide open.

[cs616]

Originally Posted by xmonkx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elethia - please see post 25-26.

Since you (and more so Alarti) clearly care about this, why not post logs of the event? Show from where the interference happening to you claiming his interference was a disqualifying act. I think that is what Ele was saying. If he did something that broke the rules, and you called him on it after it happened but before you died, then you'd have an argument.

Until you do that, the fact that you carried on for 30 minutes after the supposed interference happened makes it seem like you're just using it as an excuse because you lost.

Also, just for reference, with a fungi and iksar regen, in 30 minutes you'd regen 6,300 hp if flopped (6hp from flopped regen + 15 from fungi) which is well over double your HP unbuffed - so even after the interference you'd have still had enough time to regen more than twice your total HP. While that doesn't have anything to do with someone being disqualified, it does illustrate how minor this supposed interference was.

[xmonkx]

Nope sure dont have it, but Necrious can confirm this.