![]() |
|
#51
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#52
|
|||
|
Itt : alarti gets slapped by his own guild.
Amazing lol. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#53
|
||||
|
Quote:
No one is surprised | |||
|
|
||||
|
#54
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Sericx made a specific provision to the bet (contract) which read: Quote:
Instead of calling the interference (breach) when it happened and terminating the PVP combat and bet immediately, another 30 minutes of back and forth training (or "PVP" as Sericx likes to call it) continued. The 30 minutes of PVP/training conduct and participation with no statement from Sericx announcing the breach amounts to a waiver of said breach. Are you trying to draw a distinction between PVP and training in VP at this point? | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#55
|
|||
|
Add the fact that the alleged breach was only raised after Sericx was killed.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#56
|
||||
|
Quote:
There was a train war... for 1st kill which has rules for disqualification, which was also mentioned prior to the disqualification. There wasn't an agreement of best out of 3. Any training after the first Disqual or death is moot. The bet was already ended unless you can find an agreement of best 2 out of 3 or sericx saying he relinquishes rights to his winnings. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#57
|
|||
|
From my understanding, there was a clause that said as soon as someone besides the combatants enter the arena, if that person is an associate of one the combatants that combatant will be disqualified instantly and shall forfeit his bet. Anything that happened after that is just a regular day in VP.
If either of you were seriously gonna pay, you would have put the money in escrow with a guide and let them enforce the rules you agreed upon and arbitrate whether a waiver of the DQ clause had been given.
__________________
Blue:
Tawisty McBardovich (60 Bard) Aalamar Bundy (60 Enchanter) Ghomie (60 Wizard) Jurassic Park (60 Necromancer) Massterr Drumok (56 Monk) Leighdybierd Johansen (50 Cleric) Gdavid (50 Magician) Snique Sniq(28 Rogue) Therbah (7 bank) Red: Aalamar (60 Enchanter) Aalasbank (1 bank) | ||
|
|
|||
|
#59
|
|||
|
there was no disqualification. sericx continued to perform the terms of the contract with no reference to disqualification, effectively waiving any cause of action he might have had regarding breach. upon losing, he raised the issue of disqualification which had been immaterial for 30 minutes. this counterclaim fails 10 times out of 10.
if anything, the fact that he raised this issue after his death provides further evidence that he knew sloan still believed the competition to be in effect. his failure to attempt to collect his winnings after the supposed disqualification occurred further undermines his position | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|