Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:30 PM
FenninEQaddict FenninEQaddict is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
More like TMO wipes to a mob twice and exceeds the 20 minute timer thus making the mob free for all. BDA shows up to take the target and TMO proceeds to kite the mob for over 10 minutes and gets caught red handed. TMO kills the mob anyways and Sirken is forced to reprimand TMO for their rule breaking and hand over the loot to BDA. Don't kite raid mobs kids, sometimes you will get caught.

Also check out my new sig quote courtesy of Aalpha with his take on the events.
Obviously there was alot of information not disclosed in Sirken's twitch chat. Doesnt change the fact that its pretty inappropriate the way it went down. Also means you now have a second monk epic you can sell so hopefully someone jumps right on that in EC. Guess the GM handouts work for someone other than TMO huh.
  #82  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:46 PM
Kika Maslyaka Kika Maslyaka is offline
Planar Protector

Kika Maslyaka's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pringles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why are GMs allowing MQ scamming, exactly? I get not "supporting" MQs, but scamming is scamming is scamming, MQ or not.
because its no different from direct trade scam:

A: WTS fungi tunic 100k
You: I will buy
A puts Cloth Tunic into your Trade Window
You put 100k and click trade

The trade is completed, and calling to GM does absolutely nothing - you clicked TRADE - whatever was in the window was traded. Its done.
__________________
Quote:
[Rogean;750468]
Aren't you suppose to be banned?

[Zuranthium;1453395]
The people who invented the first space ships were brilliant. That doesn't mean anybody should actually want to use them 200 years later. Ideas are limited by means of execution. Everquest has amazing ideas that need to be completely reworked in their execution, in order for classic Everquest as it was envisioned to actually exist and continue to be relevant as things have evolved.
  #83  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:46 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenninEQaddict [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Obviously there was alot of information not disclosed in Sirken's twitch chat. Doesnt change the fact that its pretty inappropriate the way it went down. Also means you now have a second monk epic you can sell so hopefully someone jumps right on that in EC. Guess the GM handouts work for someone other than TMO huh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
TMO can't take the competition or their own tactics working against them? unpossible! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #84  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:49 PM
Widan Widan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kika Maslyaka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The trade is completed, and calling to GM does absolutely nothing - you clicked TRADE - whatever was in the window was traded. Its done.
Not exactly seeing as GM's are people and not robots so they can make decisions on a case by case basis. Though it seems they have decided that all scamming will go unpunished. The question the community wants to know is why?
  #85  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:52 PM
skipdog skipdog is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 462
Default

Getting scammed sucks. But what if Flame didn't get scammed and the person he was dealing with truly did just mess up the turn-in or there was a weird issue affecting the MQ? You guys really think both people should just be screwed? Because MQs are... uhh lame?

I think it is unfortunate that the GMs here stopped CSR support of MQs and Account Trading recently.

It's frustrating to join a server and put so much time into it because of things like CSR supported MQs and legit Account Trades so when those things get removed, you start to wonder about what will be changed next. I'd rather see them show interest in finding more GMs if 'its taking too much of our time' is the real reason they changed their policy on these things.

For instance, a big part of my motivation to level characters is that I know that my time is worth something. I know that I can turn that time spent on a character into plat at some point if I'd like to. That 'making my time feel worth something' feeling is gone. I know I can do shady backroom deals to sell a character for plat but I don't want to do that.

In terms of MQ support, I don't see any good reason why there shouldn't be CSR support for MQs. I like the bigger variety of 'camps you can hold to make plat' that MQing gives us. The changing of that policy seemed to coincide with many whining forum posts on the topic. Either way, it's frustrating to have such longstanding policies be changed when dealing with something that requires so much of a time investment as Everquest.

I guess it comes down to the 'I am playing here because of how the rules were and my belief that these longstanding rules would not be changed' and it seems unjust to make changes to some of the core things that have kept some of us here in the first place.
  #86  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:55 PM
Flamewraith Flamewraith is offline
Sarnak

Flamewraith's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Dakota eh
Posts: 450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skipdog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Getting scammed sucks. But what if Flame didn't get scammed and the person he was dealing with truly did just mess up the turn-in or there was a weird issue affecting the MQ? You guys really think both people should just be screwed? Because MQs are... uhh lame?

I think it is unfortunate that the GMs here stopped CSR support of MQs and Account Trading recently.

It's frustrating to join a server and put so much time into it because of things like CSR supported MQs and legit Account Trades so when those things get removed, you start to wonder about what will be changed next. I'd rather see them show interest in finding more GMs if 'its taking too much of our time' is the real reason they changed their policy on these things.

For instance, a big part of my motivation to level characters is that I know that my time is worth something. I know that I can turn that time spent on a character into plat at some point if I'd like to. That 'making my time feel worth something' feeling is gone. I know I can do shady backroom deals to sell a character for plat but I don't want to do that.

In terms of MQ support, I don't see any good reason why there shouldn't be CSR support for MQs. I like the bigger variety of 'camps you can hold to make plat' that MQing gives us. The changing of that policy seemed to coincide with many whining forum posts on the topic. Either way, it's frustrating to have such longstanding policies be changed when dealing with something that requires so much of a time investment as Everquest.

I guess it comes down to the 'I am playing here because of how the rules were and my belief that these longstanding rules would not be changed' and it seems unjust to make changes to some of the core things that have kept some of us here in the first place.
I hope this is a "what if" because if it's not, then you can't read. We didn't DO the MQ, he handed me the jeweled dagger and told me to wait fro him to show up. He never showed up. He then put me on ignore.
__________________
Pharuin Flamewraith-60 epic Archmage
Kovras Bladewraith-30 Rogue
Goryn Bearclaw-36 Ranger
  #87  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:55 PM
Kika Maslyaka Kika Maslyaka is offline
Planar Protector

Kika Maslyaka's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Widan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not exactly seeing as GM's are people and not robots so they can make decisions on a case by case basis. Though it seems they have decided that all scamming will go unpunished. The question the community wants to know is why?
if I would have sold you some MQ for say 100k, and never delivered, how would you prove that you didn't simply owed me 100k that you just returned? Cause that's what I will claim.
__________________
Quote:
[Rogean;750468]
Aren't you suppose to be banned?

[Zuranthium;1453395]
The people who invented the first space ships were brilliant. That doesn't mean anybody should actually want to use them 200 years later. Ideas are limited by means of execution. Everquest has amazing ideas that need to be completely reworked in their execution, in order for classic Everquest as it was envisioned to actually exist and continue to be relevant as things have evolved.
  #88  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:57 PM
FenninEQaddict FenninEQaddict is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
TMO can't take the competition or their own tactics working against them? unpossible! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wondering who will end up losing that fight. TMO may have more to lose if BDA could compete but the past has shown this is their only chance from what I've heard. Dont start it yet I need to go get popcorn first for the show. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #89  
Old 09-13-2013, 03:58 PM
Vaildez Vaildez is offline
Kobold

Vaildez's Avatar

Join Date: May 2013
Location: The Salty Maid
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kika Maslyaka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if I would have sold you some MQ for say 100k, and never delivered, how would you prove that you didn't simply owed me 100k that you just returned? Cause that's what I will claim.
And that is why we have a database. They can easily pull a query and prove this is false.
  #90  
Old 09-13-2013, 04:00 PM
ncapatina ncapatina is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kika Maslyaka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if I would have sold you some MQ for say 100k, and never delivered, how would you prove that you didn't simply owed me 100k that you just returned? Cause that's what I will claim.
I'd assume there would be a detailed chat log of the sale. It's never a he said/she said situation there are lots of data points the GM staff have access to.

That being said, if they endorsed MQing by supporting it that's just another time suck away from important issues/development. It's a small team.

Either make the items droppable so a true trade can happen, or leave it free for all and people will just have to make good decisions.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.