THE THREAD TO END ALL THREADS- LET'S STOP POSTING

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Chronoburn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Enough with the custom content

[Nirgon]

But I had all these ideas for player controlled cities, a cross server raid finder and gear transmogrification so I can always look how I want [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Darksinga]

/face palm

I'm done. Refer to Smedy's post.

[Darksinga]

Originally Posted by Porz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I feel like you put down what you wanted to see implemented with a weak argument for others options.
Sz99-

The only thing that I personally "wanted," I put as so. (Play Nice Policy.) And any one who disagrees with a play nice policy is obviously thinking of only the red's player base, not blue. What does training, bind camping, and corpse camping promote? More griefing. The only valid argument I've seen to a "self governed server" is more fun stories to be told? Lol? Know what a self governed society is? Anarchy.

Even the level cap is a weak argument tbh, but that's a pretty minor point and doesn't have too much prevalence on the rest of the post.

Everything else is fairly spot on. I don't understand why people keep suggesting custom things like turn in coins for pots, create new items (FV hammer,) start every race in the same city, etc... Just not classic.

[Darksinga]

Originally Posted by Rokannis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The Discord idea is still a terrible idea. Either hardcode teams or don't, none of this "in between" shit. The Discord team is just the "Red99" team, which will be full of faggots and griefers because it promotes selfishness instead of teamplay. This will destroy the Discord team and they will become unviable to end game. No one will play them but the same neckbeards that play Red99, and we see how well that worked out.

Personally not my idea, but I've seen it posted several places over the forums and thought it was a good enough to reference here.

[Andis]

Actually Darksinga pretty much nailed it

A+ pal

[Darksinga]

Originally Posted by Velus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wouldn't call this a list of general agreements. Many of these are way too splintered in acceptance.

A number of people would like open-level PvP, and only whatever the PvP death penalty is to be applied on an 'even con' level range.

First of all, you have to comprehend that I summarized many threads together to get a central post. The only things that a select few may disagree with are a few SZ rules that ultimately resulted in that server ending up with the lowest population. If we want any one from blue to stay or even try out server, lets not make the same mistake of allowing griefers to run rampant twice.

Also, don't even understand how people would want a server where lvl 50s could shit on lvl 10s. It's not live where people on your team are not going to sit in CB all day and white knight protect you. This is a worse idea than the allowance of training, CC, bind camping. Hey pal welcome to the server eat this ice comet (wait I dont need to load ice comet- what's the lvl 30 nuke?) until you quit. GG Red GG.

[Darksinga]

Originally Posted by Andis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Actually Darksinga pretty much nailed it

A+ pal

Thx pal, I'd give myself a B+ because a few ideas could be tweaked/thrown out. Progressive lvling is one. Discord FFA is another. 3 hardcoded teams might work best, just have to suck it up and get pooped on by evil teams obvious advantage. I'm obviously still rolling good team.

Made some edits based on feedback in thread. With the exception of the no PnP and no lvl range.

[Chronoburn]

Originally Posted by Darksinga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Play-nice policy-- sorry you hardcore-ers
-No trains
-No CC (exception is if the person does not want to give up zone control and choses not to call LnS. Or are just to prideful.)
-No Bind Camping (No exceptions.)
-LnS enabled. MUST leave zone for one hour (can tweak time amount--but LnS is simply a must. Others have also suggested guild leader LnS agreements. If a guild loses in PvP the guild leader must forfeit zone control and call LnS to claim bodies safely.)

Having no "Play-Nice Policy" on SZ was one of the major appeals for myself. I don't know if I'm in the majority/minority in regards to this though.

-Training - Training allowed for smaller and/or casual guilds a chance in terms of content. It also prevents guilds from progressing at poop suck rates. I'm not really in favor of same team training but it was amusing to train Velketor to the ZL time to time ....

-No CC- Zones were typically controlled by teams... if you wanted to risk going to an opposing teams territory, you may be CCd if you died... but you made the choice. You could also ask for LnS but rarely this would happen on SZ. Going to Seb as a newt was intense but that sense of adventure was brought on by the risk involved with it.

-No Bind Camping - Don't bind in a stupid spot, don't go afk at or near your bind, and don't fall asleep at the keyboard (see Pino). If for some chance you are being camped, plug it and log on an alt.

LnS- Should be up to the players. GM intervention would be garbage.

Just my opinion, I'm probably not alone on this either.

[Azure]

Never Stop!