Game Mechanics: Warrior aggro procs are probably wrong

[Arteker]

Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, I agree that 100dd and -11ac should be good aggro.

I just don't get that people complained about the weapon not being good -- enough that it was eventually (or so it appears) change to just a simple +500hate 100dd.

Not trying to disagree with anyone here, just raising questions.

I just don't get the time line of the events and what people felt was so bad about it compared to other things.

the answer to hit lies in veridrix short sword and veldrak shorts swords and shishar swords.

like it happened in velious dd+stun mechanic ranked way better for agro purpose ,infact the great deal with such agro was the fact a stun wich didint land or worked would even generate more agro than one wich landed.


to put a example , when paladins got their small fast cast stuns wich got resisted by low lvl mobs it was a a massive and massive agro tool wich screwed out warriors big time.im talking about cease and desist low lvl stun

it was a hugue debate in test server and main reason pure agro procs where added and later refined.

when it wasnt even enough to give a boost to wars agro over paladin stuns and sks terror and torrent line they launched the big nerf in stun agro.

wich for land for full agro needed to land, was main reason anger procs made enragin blow obsolete since the stun component+ agro mod would work always unlike most paladins stuns.