|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What are people thinking as far as the system for selecting raid targets? | |||
| PVE Competition (like Hasbinbad's FG idea) |
   
|
1 | 2.56% |
| PVE Competition (other) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| PVP Competition (like Hasbinbad's DUEL idea) |
  
|
4 | 10.26% |
| PVP Competition (other) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| No Spawn Variance (camping OK like Nizzarr's method) |
  
|
2 | 5.13% |
| No Spawn Variance (ANTI-camping rules - SPECIFY IN POST) |
  
|
1 | 2.56% |
| Spawn Variance (camping OK like Dartagnan's method) |
|
9 | 23.08% |
| Spawn Variance (ANTI-camping rules - SPECIFY IN POST) |
|
7 | 17.95% |
| Enforced GM Rotation (everything split exactly equally) |
|
11 | 28.21% |
| Other (no rules [ffa/ks], a new system, something that was forgotten, etc. - SPECIFY IN POST) |
|
4 | 10.26% |
| Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
12-21-2009, 10:43 AM
|
|||
|
Spawn Variance with anti camping rules is the only way to go.
People have already posted example situations where being in a zone first = "claiming" the mob rule will ALWAYS result in problems, variance or not. People will just sit in the zone even longer, that's all, and both guilds will still be there at the same time. +12/-12 hour spawn variance and you're not allowed in the zone until the raid target spawns. | ||
|
|
|||
|
|
Threaded Mode