Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: do you think the current VP rules are bullshit?
yes 327 68.99%
no 147 31.01%
Voters: 474. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #531  
Old 08-07-2013, 05:54 PM
Turp_SmokinPurp Turp_SmokinPurp is offline
Kobold

Turp_SmokinPurp's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
velious is still a ways off.

But to say training is going to guarantee the sleeper wont be awoken? That's just stupidity and ignorance. If its already possible to derail trains in VP and take dragons down, as has been proven, then training is not going to be effective enough to prevent the waking of the sleeper anyway. If those who want to wake the sleeper are driven enough they will have 20-30 people waiting to derail any possible trains, and its possible to do so completely and indeffinetly in any zone.
I am not saying training will guarantee the sleeper not being woke. I said it is a way to help protect the sleeper, so is PvP. Even though it will not 100% guarantee him not being woken, it will damn sure delay it and could very easily prevent it a lot of times. Yes it can still be woken with training, and the right amount of people set on waking it.

You are right, it is possible to derail VP trains, but has any guild came in derailed a train an got a dragon from TMO? Yes, but is rare + and it was not the best/baddest dragon in the zone. An i bet even a more rare chance of the derailed train and kill happening with it being the mean ass sleeper.

So this is on VP only. If there was no training and no PvP in VP, it would be a shit show of "accident" trains and who knows what else. A big headache for staff imo to sort out all the problems it would cause if there was No pvp No trains VP.

I agree fuck the training in VP, it does not belong, but if training IS taken out than you have to put in place PvP for those 2 zones to keep it fun/not a headache for GM. It would be a wish if that would happen.

Hopefully some higher ups are reading this and take into consideration VP and ST PvP.
It would be fun and would allow for more competition.
__________________

Turp --- Purp
60 Shm 60 Wiz
Last edited by Turp_SmokinPurp; 08-07-2013 at 06:01 PM.. Reason: mispell
  #532  
Old 08-07-2013, 05:56 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turp_SmokinPurp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am not saying training will guarantee the sleeper not being woke. I said it is a way to help protect the sleeper, so is PvP. Even though it will not 100% guarantee him not being woken, it will damn sure delay it and could very easily prevent it a lot of times. Yes it can still be woken with training, and the right amount of people set on waking it.

So this is on VP only. You are right, it is possible to derail VP trains, but has any guild came in derailed a train an got a dragon from TMO? Yes, but rare. If there was no training and no PvP in VP, it would be a shit show of "accident" trains and who knows what else. A big headache for staff imo to sort out all the problems it would cause No pvp No trains.

I agree fuck the training in VP, it does not belong, but if training IS taken out THAN put in place PvP for those 2 zones only. It would be a wish/great if that would happen.

Hopefully some higher ups are reading this and take into consideration VP and ST PvP.
It would be fun and would allow for more competition.
If it had to come down to PVP flagging VP/ST or allowing training, I would certainly vote PVP. Training is way less difficult to do and boring as hell for the folks who aren't necessarily "trainers" or whatever.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #533  
Old 08-07-2013, 06:05 PM
Turp_SmokinPurp Turp_SmokinPurp is offline
Kobold

Turp_SmokinPurp's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If it had to come down to PVP flagging VP/ST or allowing training, I would certainly vote PVP. Training is way less difficult to do and boring as hell for the folks who aren't necessarily "trainers" or whatever.
I agree 100% and would also vote PvP. It is not fun at all if your not the one training, an PvP would add a huge/fun part to our server.

Maybe after this poll is done Tasslehof , you will start up a PvP ST Thread or ST/VP even if want. I would like to see everyones take on that. An will vote.
__________________

Turp --- Purp
60 Shm 60 Wiz
  #534  
Old 08-07-2013, 06:28 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasselhof
A major theme I've noticed is people's unwillingness to bury the past and move forward for the greater good of the server.
One person's definition of "greater good" differs from another.

Choo Choo on this!
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[45 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
  #535  
Old 08-07-2013, 07:13 PM
Langrisser Langrisser is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 189
Default

who the fuck is that tranny
  #536  
Old 08-07-2013, 07:40 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Help Tasslehof get more loot - vote yes.
Ever the comic
  #537  
Old 08-07-2013, 09:25 PM
Rhuma7 Rhuma7 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 171
Default

Its obvious the people saying the warders in ST are hard, havent ever fought them. Their a bunch of fucking pansies and can be killed very easily with NTOV gear.
  #538  
Old 08-08-2013, 03:02 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
One person's definition of "greater good" differs from another.

Choo Choo on this!
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That is why I added the accompanying poll so that we can get an idea of where the players stand regarding this situation. This isn't about one player or one guild like I have said, nor is it about past shitty experiences in VP. This is about figuring out how to do away with a non-classic, shitty, rule set for veeshan's peak.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #539  
Old 08-08-2013, 06:41 AM
Brut Brut is offline
Planar Protector

Brut's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Akin to North Pole
Posts: 1,403
Default

What's with this whole "we must have means to protect the Sleeper from being woken" nonsense anyway? The sleeper waking up is a unique server mechanic; if the server populance can't agree with each other enough to refrain from waking it up, then tough luck we all lose. The server shouldn't be designed around your fear of someone stopping the farming of SoDs until 2020.
__________________
Brutillus 60 Dragon Hero Bracer Shadowknight - <Awakened>
http://i63.tinypic.com/208jtcm.jpg
  #540  
Old 08-08-2013, 08:54 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Still?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
go away troll
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.