![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: do you think the current VP rules are bullshit? | |||
| yes |
|
327 | 68.99% |
| no |
|
147 | 31.01% |
| Voters: 474. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#531
|
||||
|
Quote:
You are right, it is possible to derail VP trains, but has any guild came in derailed a train an got a dragon from TMO? Yes, but is rare + and it was not the best/baddest dragon in the zone. An i bet even a more rare chance of the derailed train and kill happening with it being the mean ass sleeper. So this is on VP only. If there was no training and no PvP in VP, it would be a shit show of "accident" trains and who knows what else. A big headache for staff imo to sort out all the problems it would cause if there was No pvp No trains VP. I agree fuck the training in VP, it does not belong, but if training IS taken out than you have to put in place PvP for those 2 zones to keep it fun/not a headache for GM. It would be a wish if that would happen. Hopefully some higher ups are reading this and take into consideration VP and ST PvP. It would be fun and would allow for more competition.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by Turp_SmokinPurp; 08-07-2013 at 06:01 PM..
Reason: mispell
|
|
|||
|
#532
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | |||
|
|
||||
|
#533
|
||||
|
Quote:
Maybe after this poll is done Tasslehof , you will start up a PvP ST Thread or ST/VP even if want. I would like to see everyones take on that. An will vote.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#534
|
||||
|
Quote:
Choo Choo on this! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
|
||||
|
#535
|
|||
|
who the fuck is that tranny
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#537
|
|||
|
Its obvious the people saying the warders in ST are hard, havent ever fought them. Their a bunch of fucking pansies and can be killed very easily with NTOV gear.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#538
|
|||
|
That is why I added the accompanying poll so that we can get an idea of where the players stand regarding this situation. This isn't about one player or one guild like I have said, nor is it about past shitty experiences in VP. This is about figuring out how to do away with a non-classic, shitty, rule set for veeshan's peak.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | ||
|
|
|||
|
#539
|
|||
|
What's with this whole "we must have means to protect the Sleeper from being woken" nonsense anyway? The sleeper waking up is a unique server mechanic; if the server populance can't agree with each other enough to refrain from waking it up, then tough luck we all lose. The server shouldn't be designed around your fear of someone stopping the farming of SoDs until 2020.
__________________
Brutillus 60 Dragon Hero Bracer Shadowknight - <Awakened>
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#540
|
|||
|
go away troll
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|