EQNext Discussion - Page 35

Thulack · #**341** 08-02-2013, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AceTravis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wasn't expecting anything like EQ Classic but this doesn't look like it will be for me. Hugely disappointed. Maybe once they show more mechanics, raiding, gear, and the quest system it will start to flesh out a little bit more and seem more appealing.

This is my feeling. But from the way the demo went i dont see this as being a game i'd like. It does remind me of GW2 and honestly graphics aren't a gamemaker for me but can be a gamebreaker and damn are those ogres and kerran's ugly.

Faerie · #**342** 08-02-2013, 04:33 PM

Yeah, what's with ogres not being adorably huggable?

Thulack · #**343** 08-02-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zanti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The whole presentation screamed "We don't know what to do so do it for us, will ya?" Design and build the world for us then vote for everything that you think you want in an MMO because the majority is always right, right? Aside from that some of the tech ideas were impressive and it was pretty to look at here and there.

They could make the world they want and throw it out there and have everyone complain or they can give you the option of "helping" create it so when the playerbase hates it they can say "well you made it"

SCB · #**344** 08-02-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treefall [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That Fiona model made me throw up a little bit.

"Oh, and here's Fiona..."

*crickets*

Who is Fiona?

lecompte · #**345** 08-02-2013, 04:33 PM

"Would somebody rez the ranger" Unacceptable language.

Tecmos Deception · #**346** 08-02-2013, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treefall [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That Fiona model made me throw up a little bit.

"Oh, and here's Fiona..."

*crickets*

Fiona? Not classic.

A1551 · #**347** 08-02-2013, 04:34 PM

I wanted to like it so bad, but it just looked like GW2 or a stupid console action rpg. They really didn't tell us or show us anything important about the actual gameplay...and from the little they did show us I was less than impressed. Oh well. I know its been said a thousand times but the kind of mass market appeal MMOS need to get green-lighted means disappointment will probably always be inevitable.

I did like the ideas behind the dynamic AI and thought some of the other ideas were promising..but overall it looks like its going to wrapped up with bland/crappy gameplay we've seen (and moved on from) a thousand times.

Thulack · #**348** 08-02-2013, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lecompte [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Would somebody rez the ranger" Unacceptable language.

Sklug is the only Dev i saw that i know was from EQ as he was still a dev on EQ up until EQNext started production.

khanable · #**349** 08-02-2013, 04:34 PM

I'm disappointed as all hell.

I actually LIKE most of what I saw.. almost all of it, actually. Multiclass is such a massive boner kill and ruins basically all the good for me though.

And RM auction house shit? No thanks

BRING ON WINTER

webrunner5 · #**350** 08-02-2013, 04:35 PM

This thing looks like total crap. WoW on growth hormones. I am not going to play that shit. Looks like it is set up for 12 year old Japanese girls. Jesus. It sucks big time. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]