Zimmerman NOT Guilty

[Stinkum]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle

Chicago is only in the sad shape it's in because the NRA has been successful at keeping our society flooded with firearms.

[Malice_Mizer]

Apparently asking a person why they're stalking you is initiating a confrontation.

Why does the question of whether or not Trayvon felt that his life was in danger mean anything to you, either?

[heartbrand]

To blame guns is ridiculous. I have access to knives / guns / household objects which I could prolly turn into a weapon or bomb within hours of watching a youtube video, but yet I've killed 0 people.

[Stinkum]

ITT: People who pretend that they would tell their kids to just passively stand there and allow a predatory stranger to stalk them in the night in their own neighborhoods.

[Barkingturtle]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I've killed 0 people.

Pussy.

[Malice_Mizer]

Originally Posted by Stinkum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ITT: People who pretend that they would tell their kids to just passively stand there and allow a predatory stranger to stalk them in the night in their own neighborhoods.

Same people who argue "GZ was in his legal right to follow Trayvon" are the first ones to cling to the argument, "WHY DIDN'T TRAYVON JUST GO HOME? HE COULD HAVE BUT HE DIDN'T..."

You can't have both, guys. Trayvon was also in total legal right to be wandering around his neighborhood on the phone at 7 fucking PM in the evening.

[CrazyHorse]

Originally Posted by K|mm Barely [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm fucking heated right now.

And I know this is the wrong place to post this shit but I just want to figure out why all you idiots support zimmerman when he committed murder.

See all you motherfuckers are inbread, stupid and stuck in the 1700's thinking you own us, but you don't. I don't care if Zimmerman was hispanic, this WHITE skin has killed my brother and then you realize why we fucking hate you, why we rape your wife, why we rob your houses, why we call you crackas.

Because what we have to suffer everyday is more than what you've ever had to suffer in a year or in your life. The jury system is corrupt as fuck and it's always being led by the white man. Trayvon deserved justice and you stupid inbreds only want to be edgy and hate black people.

Don't blame all black people for your past memories, I don't give a fuck what some guy did to you, it was probably well fucking deserve because your ignorant ass is racist.

I'm done, l'm Ieaving out of this stupid site. You could write whatever the fuck you want, you are all racist and stupid as fuck if you don't think Zimmerman is guiIty of murder.

The people you claim 'support' Zimmerman simply support due process of law. I think Zimmerman did it, but I am happy with the verdict simply because I see the larger picture: People shouldn't go to jail unless guilt can be PROVEN. His life is over, and he will probably get shenked by someone who recognizes him as he's walking down the street anyway. I'll take a killer getting away with murder over an innocent person going to jail any day.

[Aaron]

Stolen from reddit bestof:
(not formatted)

In spite of all the trial coverage and media rehashing of this case, it's amazing how few people seem to realize what the evidence is that surprisingly clearly shows happened that night. Zimmerman wasn't just not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. He was obviously innocent of any criminal act, and frankly in my opinion on completely morally sound ground.
The facts:
Zimmerman claimed to be trying to follow from a safe distance just so police would have a chance to question Martin. There had been break ins and what George did really isn't any different than what other neighborhood watches have done in the past. Martin didn't like being followed so he gave Zimmerman the slip, hid in the shadows, waiting for Zimmerman to pass, and then Martin approached Zimmerman from behind, initiated the confrontation and broke Zimmerman's nose. No evidence or testimony has ever contradicted this.
Other than the single point blank gun shot wound, Martin had no injuries. Zimmerman on the other hand looked beaten all to hell. This was consistent with Zimmerman being on the receiving end of an unexpected one sided beat down.
When investigating officers lied and told Zimmerman that they had footage of the incident, Zimmerman was relieved, and said something along the lines of, "Thank God! I was hoping someone would have filmed to help prove what happened." This convinced the officer that Zimmerman was telling the truth.
Trayvon who has been regularly depicted in the media as younger and practically a saint, was actually suspended from school, not for being absent, but for having drugs and possible stolen goods at school. While he no doubt also had his sweet side, his twitter handle was “No_Limit_*****” filled with gangsta nonsense, and the only racial slurs ever uttered in the case were said by Trayvon and not Zimmerman. I'm not saying that any of this proves Trayvon was guilty or by any means deserved to die. The only thing that the evidence clearly points to Trayvon being guilty of is initiating the Assault on Zimmerman.
The officers who investigated the shooting found no probable cause for arrest, because every part of Zimmerman's story was supported by the limited evidence. The chief of police later lost his job because he refused to arrest Zimmerman without more evidence, despite all the political pressure. The normal prosecutor didn't take this case for 'mysterious' reasons, likely because he didn't want to take a losing case and prosecute a man who as so obviously innocent. Normally the prosecutor gets to decide if he wants to pursue a case, but not this time, the activist pressure was too high. Even the ringers they brought in to substitute never really presented a good alternate explanation, and admitted in summation that the only two who really knew what happened were Zimmerman and Trayvon. It's obviously way past reasonable doubt when even the prosecutor can't say he knows the guy did it.
Essentially this open and shut case only went to trial because racist racial activists went off before the facts were in and they even realized that George Zimmerman wasn't even white.
You can argue that getting out of the car wasn't smart, but the evidence shows George Zimmerman did nothing wrong.

THE SOURCES (Since everyone I mention this to immediately asks me for them anyway.)
Point 1. The videotaped walkthrough of the scene of the crime and the recounting of that night that Zimmerman did with the police.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PX1sxARNq_c
Point 2. Summaries of the autopsy of Martin and medical examination of Zimmerman's injuries.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/wo...161/story.html
http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/06...martin-autopsy
Point 3. The investigating officer testifying on the "It looks like he recorded the whole thing," bluff. Skip to 1:16:00 to cut to the chase.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoPhJP5TmJo
Point 4. Links on Martin's Checkered past.
Caught with Weed Pipe and Marijuana Bag at school - http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/Trayvon...144403305.html
Caught with suspected stolen property and burglarly tools at school - http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/2...t-trayvon.html
Thug life Twitter Feed: http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/26/th...artins-tweets/
Martin's Racial Slurs: http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/06...comment-known/
Point 5. Video of the interview with the Police chief who was fired for refusing to arrest Zimmerman for lack of evidence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaiO23GcGzY

TLDR - Everyone has an opinion on this case, but surprisingly few have taken the time to learn the facts. There is no evidence that George Zimmerman did anything wrong.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Apparently asking a person why they're stalking you is initiating a confrontation.

Why does the question of whether or not Trayvon felt that his life was in danger mean anything to you, either?

Are you trolling? I honestly can't tell. Or do you not realize that how either of them 'felt' is fucking irrelevant until someone (Trayvon) decided to respond to words with his fists.

Originally Posted by Stinkum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ITT: People who pretend that they would tell their kids to just passively stand there and allow a predatory stranger to stalk them in the night in their own neighborhoods.

You must be trolling, no other explanation for the blatant ignorance of this statement. Going home or calling the cops or taking any other reasonable action that does not include initiating a physical confrontation is absolutely not "Just passively standing there".
Fucking Trayvon apologists need to get a clue.

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Same people who argue "GZ was in his legal right to follow Trayvon" are the first ones to cling to the argument, "WHY DIDN'T TRAYVON JUST GO HOME? HE COULD HAVE BUT HE DIDN'T..."

You can't have both, guys. Trayvon was also in total legal right to be wandering around his neighborhood on the phone at 7 fucking PM in the evening.

Gotta say, I lol'd. Dumbass.

[Malice_Mizer]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you trolling? I honestly can't tell. Or do you not realize that how either of them 'felt' is fucking irrelevant until someone (Trayvon) decided to respond to words with his fists.

You must be trolling, no other explanation for the blatant ignorance of this statement. Going home or calling the cops or taking any other reasonable action that does not include initiating a physical confrontation is absolutely not "Just passively standing there".
Fucking Trayvon apologists need to get a clue.

Gotta say, I lol'd. Dumbass.

Innocent until proven guilty, unless your entire theory rests upon the unproven assumption that Trayvon threw a punch at GZ.

What evidence do you have of that, exactly? Or are you just taking GZ's word for it because it makes the most sense to you personally?

Either way, you're certainly not coming at this from a place of evidence.

Do you not realize that your entire framework in this case is built upon assumptions, as well..?