Zimmerman NOT Guilty

[Massive Marc]

White people are sitting at home scratching their head, watching these protest saying: They know this guy is Latino right ?....

[Mesenkomaha]

Originally Posted by Massive Marc [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

White people are sitting at home scratching their head, watching these protest saying: They know this guy is Latino right ?....

The media has labeled him as a "White Hispanic"

That means protesters can go knock over a Walmart in LA I guess.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3602428.html

Or beat people.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/m...215656431.html

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/mar...,5135359.story

http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-...g-song-/nYqdG/

http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/2285076...#axzz2Z8TvGzrd

[myriverse]

NRA won't release the names of its members. How convenient. So, no one would know if any criminal was or wasn't an NRA member.

Also, there are a great many liberals that are NRA members.

[Massive Marc]

Originally Posted by Mesenkomaha [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The media has labeled him as a "White Hispanic"

That means protesters can go knock over a Walmart in LA I guess.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3602428.html

Or beat people.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/m...215656431.html

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/mar...,5135359.story

http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-...g-song-/nYqdG/

http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/2285076...#axzz2Z8TvGzrd

While I'm sure we can agree that what the media labels him does indeed matter (when it comes to perception) but Zimmerman self identifies as a Latino. (no White preface)

Either way, those links are fucking LOL. Why the world cares about some fat "Latino" shooting some black kid, blows my mind.

Side Note: lol at the amount of white people at these protests. white people are so scared of being called racist, that they attend a protest they would normally not bat an eye too. laughable.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Mesenkomaha [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't think it is right that in my HYPOTHETICAL example that Z HYPOTHETICALLY grabbed M. Again, no one knows the facts and we are just theorycrafting here. In this example they were both wrong. IF Z did grab M though, does that justify beating the guy up? If someone grabs your arm and asks you a question do you turn around, jump on them and pound their head into the concrete? You're smarter than that man.

They both fucked up, and they both paid the price for making very poor decisions. M is dead because he attacked the guy and Z's life is ruined because he pursued M and probably should have let him go in the first place. There are no winners here.

i don't share your opinion about what happened. i believe trayvon likely initiated physical violence, which is why i'm at least somewhat sympathetic to zimmerman as opposed to outraged that he escaped justice.

in your hypothetical, only zimmerman did something wrong. trayvon absolutely would have been justified by the law in beating the shit out of zimmerman. trayvon's a 17-year old. he was followed by a grown man. if, upon encountering the man, he attempted to escape and the man grabbed him in order to prevent that escape, trayvon had every right to defend himself using appropriate -- ie: not deadly -- force. if, as zimmerman claims, martin saw his gun, trayvon could even make a case for lethal force, given that his attacker had a gun and he feared for his life.

zimmerman didn't have some kind of special authority as a watchman. he's allowed to follow because anyone is allowed to follow. but if he follows and grabs a 17-year old, he's committing a crime. you're not allowed to walk around grabbing minors at night as they try to get away from you.

[Stinkum]

Originally Posted by myriverse [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

NRA won't release the names of its members. How convenient. So, no one would know if any criminal was or wasn't an NRA member.

Also, there are a great many liberals that are NRA members.

Ssshhhh.. Don't tell them cold-hard facts. They might let them get in the way of their warped world view of "the big bad evil liberals are destroyin' are cunnnnnntry"

[hatelore]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's more accurate to say he met a man incapable of defending himself. I mean, the gun defended Zimmerman. Furthermore, if George had been capable of physically defending himself Trayvon would probably still be alive. Further-furthermore, if George had beaten Trayvon to death with his bare hands -- this verdict would have been different.

Guns are the issue. Not racism nor anything else. Trayvon's dead because even cowards are allowed to stalk the streets armed. Not that it will matter, I mean not even Sandy Hook could provoke any change whatsoever. The NRA is all-powerful and they're the reason this case has been granted the coverage it has. Nothing's better for the gun industry's bottom-line than the state-sponsored murder of black children. This is become sport in America -- and Florida is the untenable incubator of our zeitgeist.

Has to be trolling. You are always hilarious, I love laughing at your replays. I refuse to believe you are serious.

[Mesenkomaha]

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/four...immerman-trial

Three teens and a 5 year old boy gunned down in Chicago over the past 20 days. Death toll in Chicago is climbing towards 500 already this year. How many of these people who died, or are doing the killing, are wearing NRA hats you think?

Where is Jesse? Al? NAACP? The Media? No money to be made in black on black violence.

[Mesenkomaha]

Actually, nevermind.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ack-crime.html

"There’s no such thing as ‘black-on-black’ crime."

Worth reading.

[Stinkum]

Way to go off the deep end, Mesen.

At this point, your posts are virtually indistinguishable from the ramblings of Naez.