![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
i wish more ppl on this thread would have commentred on my Zial thread because I seriously come across like a douche bag despite being the one that was being KS'd. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#12
|
||||||
|
Quote:
The word "respect" shows up about half a dozen times in your post but I'm not convinced you know what it means unless it benefits you. If someone's there, it's camped. Ask if they're leaving soon or wait for them to wipe out, but don't expect some portion of the spawn based on your evaluation of their performance. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Nocte: 60 Cleric
Duchess: 60 Rogue Bizarro Nalkin: 55 Gnecromancer | |||||
|
|
||||||
|
#13
|
||||
|
Quote:
That's pretty blatantly stated, no maneuvering required. Just thought I'd throw that out there. Some dude killing a couple of specs and vehemently refusing to let someone else kill any specs at all is sort of a fail/lose situation IMO.
__________________
![]() ^Spawn Broodling misclick.. we still won okay?^ Level 50 Bard and stuff. Some kind of guy in <Dark Ascension> and things. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#14
|
|||
|
Also, it comes down more to "courtesy" than "respect" - I.E. I'm courteous enough to avoid this stupid drama over specs, since there's really absolutely nothing about you or the rules to respect.
__________________
![]() ^Spawn Broodling misclick.. we still won okay?^ Level 50 Bard and stuff. Some kind of guy in <Dark Ascension> and things. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
Except what makes you think that these people are going to be satisfied with their two specters? Lets say 20 minutes go by and the original camper goes afk for 2 minutes, comes back and the guy says Well you weren't killing it you can't claim it.
If people are going to throw the rulebook down, argue, and post on the forums about 2 specters why not try for 3 or 4.... | ||
|
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
TLDR: please give people the benefit of the doubt when they're able to kill a sizeable number of mobs in a certain camp, but when they're clearly unable to hold a reasonable portion of the camp, that's a different issue altogether. | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#19
|
||||
|
Quote:
The you can follow the letter of the "law" and still be a total chucklefuck. Just because there's a rule that allows you to take an action without administrative reprisal doesn't absolve you of being an asshole for doing it.
__________________
Nocte: 60 Cleric
Duchess: 60 Rogue Bizarro Nalkin: 55 Gnecromancer | |||
|
|
||||
|
#20
|
|||
|
there's rules and there's social unwritten rules.
the op has got the rule right. i don't think any gm is going to have problem if he witnesses you "taking" the two spawns that the other guy can't keep down. then there are the social rules. you may be right, but that doesn't mean you are nice. if you don't care about being good/nice to others then stop reading. most of the time disagreements can be settled by just talking to the other person. scenario 1: "Pardon me, I see that you are camping specs and that there are few in the cycle you aren't getting to. Would you mind if I pulled those please?" scenario 2: Just jumping in and taking the specs. When asked what you are doing you say, "Dude, you aren't even able to kill them all, so wtf do you care what I do?" *** It's all in how you approach the situation. Nobody likes a rules lawyer or a smart ass. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|