About Spawn variance.... - Page 18

Humerox · #**171** 07-24-2010, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so theres 3-5 casual guilds on the server and they want to put their rules down on the 2 "hardcore" guilds. So basically you guys can force both DA and IB to accept whatever you guys come up with? sounds fair! I suggest you start the meeting tonight!

A majority of guilds can force DA and IB to accept it. DA and IB don't even have to to show up, tbh.

Be nice if they did, because it would indicate they're interested in the health and vitality of the server over their own self-interest.

Chicka · #**172** 07-24-2010, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghaz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Funny that "hardcore" gaming has turned into leaving your computer on for days and waiting for a text from a guild member.

It's not funny at all.

Hardcore = what it takes to be top.

Sadly due to the set of rules we must abide by on this server it has been reduced to that. But don't fool yourself, there are actually quite a few people at the keyboard, even if the toons don't move much.

Valent · #**173** 07-24-2010, 01:43 PM

Do you

Skope · #**174** 07-24-2010, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so theres 3-5 casual guilds on the server and they want to put their rules down on the 2 "hardcore" guilds. So basically you guys can force both DA and IB to accept whatever you guys come up with? sounds fair! I suggest you start the meeting tonight!

That's not the way it worked and you know it. Everyone had and has an input and it's as equal as everyone else's. In fact, there were only 4 guilds invited to the meetings, 2 hardcore guilds and divinity/remedy. Whether you like poopsocking or not doesn't matter at this point, because an overwhelming majority of the server doesn't.

Nizzarr · #**175** 07-24-2010, 01:45 PM

How about guilds that actively seeks to kill raid targets are only allowed to vote on raiding rules?

That sounds more fair to me. I dont really want Transcendence's rag team to have power over decisions.

Humerox · #**176** 07-24-2010, 01:46 PM

Well, GC was invited too, but I don't think they showed up, lol.

Point is we need to do something. Anyone who thinks the rules can't be changed is sadly mistaken.

Valent · #**177** 07-24-2010, 01:48 PM

"How about guilds that actively seeks to kill raid targets are only allowed to vote on raiding rules?"

IB and DA get to make the rules

Nizzarr · #**178** 07-24-2010, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's not the way it worked and you know it. Everyone had and has an input and it's as equal as everyone else's. In fact, there were only 4 guilds invited to the meetings, 2 hardcore guilds and divinity/remedy. Whether you like poopsocking or not doesn't matter at this point, because an overwhelming majority of the server doesn't.

No one likes poopsocking, but thats the only compromise that could be made outside of a rotation.

Find something better with this in mind:

1) no GM interactions.

That's it. I'll let you have my poopsock while you think of something.

Bumamgar · #**179** 07-24-2010, 01:49 PM

For what it's worth, WI, IB and DA have already worked together to agree on a raid-rule proposal and sent it to Nilbog...

Humerox · #**180** 07-24-2010, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How about guilds that actively seeks to kill raid targets are only allowed to vote on raiding rules?

That sounds more fair to me. I dont really want Transcendence's rag team to have power over decisions.

Fair to whom?

All interested guilds should have a voice in what determining what happens on the server.