Velious Variance Discussion:

[falkun]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your implication was pretty clear. You are either stating that TMO or Myself want to change rules to suit our needs. Implying that we are self-serving in nature.

TMO is self-serving in nature:

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rotations are generally created when it is in the rotating guild’s interests to do so. Very rarely, if ever, are they fully motivated by altruism. Each guild will zealously look out for its own interests as it should. TMO needs a lot of teeth still, and this is probably the biggest reason we’re not currently overly interested in a rotation. Notice that TMO only began rotating with IB when it was getting roughly half or slightly more of the Traks.

It’s decision theory. That said, eventually TMO would probably agree to a rotation when it appears in the guild’s interests. TMO is, overall, interested in being a reasonable and valuable portion of the community. But, the first responsibility is to the membership. While I appreciate the idea of an open slot on the rotation, accepting that when so many members still need teeth and other drops, would violate the duty the guild owes its members.

Is it wrong to be self-serving? No, no one has your interests in mind as well as you do.

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe you are just so used to attacking TMO you don't even realize when you are doing it anymore.

I didn't mention paragraph #1 in my response. Paragraph #1 calls you out for the veil you are posting this from behind. Tiddlywinks puts it better:

Originally Posted by Tiddlywinks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And honestly, Alarti, the only reason you created this thread is because you know TMO isn't going to want to sit on their ass and track double the content they now do, while at the same giving up on past gains.

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But for the purposes of this thread you seem to not like variance, so lets move on.

Sounds good.