So how about that Zimmerman trial?

[oddibemcd]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyone who just takes Zimmerman's word for it about who started it is an idiot. Or maybe just racist. He has every motivation in the world to lie, and knew exactly the kind of story he would need to tell. And guess what...he changed his story many times after caught in lies.
I already said he should be found not guilty based on what we've seen so far. But to get all worked about Travon being a "punk" and how Zimmerman did nothing wrong is pretty pathetic.

Yeah, no.

People claim the fact that he didn't remember the street names to be a lie, but that occurred before the confrontation when he was still talking to 311. He had no reason to lie to the NEN and has stayed consistent. His accounts of the night fit in with other eye-witness testimony. His claim that he wasn't familiar with SYG law was corroborated by his teacher who stated that SYG wasn't referenced in the class Zimmerman took.

Meanwhile, you have that waste of skin Didi who lied about everything under the sun (funeral, age, name, what Martin said on the phone), yet people swallow her testimony hook, line and sinker.

Dispatch requested Zimmerman twice to keep eyes on Martin. The watch was described by the police representative as the eyes and ears of the neighborhood. Martin suffered no injuries besides the bullet wound and injuries on his knuckles consistent with punching.