PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nobody reads your essays bro.

I like how you claim ' witnessed Amelinda say it was ok"

Law school, is that a valid argument?

I like how you claim no one reads and then you quote it. All an argument needs is a premise and a conclusion to be valid, so yes it's a valid argument. Sounds like you're questioning the validity of my premise.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By the time you pay off your student loans I will be 1.1million saved in the bank ahead of you congrats

Money is one thing ill never have to worry about, so I always giggle when people try to troll me about it.

[Sickpuppy]

Tissues anyone ?

[Elderan]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nobody reads your essays bro.

I like how you claim ' witnessed Amelinda say it was ok"

Law school, is that a valid argument?

Originally Posted by p-niner View Post
Nizzar blatantly ignored the rule from classic, why is that hard to understand?

Show the post where it stated you needed to change your bind from these zones before Sirkens post yesterday.

[SamwiseRed]

Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Show the post where it stated you needed to change your bind from these zones before Sirkens post yesterday.

u a moran or something? if binding was removed from these zones because of unfair pvp advantages, why the hell would you think if you are already bound there you are good to go? i know its your job to act like a retard on the forums but dayum get a brain.

[p-niner]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like how you claim no one reads and then you quote it. All an argument needs is a premise and a conclusion to be valid, so yes it's a valid argument. Sounds like you're questioning the validity of my premise.

Quoted u lol?

[p-niner]

Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Show the post where it stated you needed to change your bind from these zones before Sirkens post yesterday.

How many months aftet kunark release was it before u rolled here
again?

[Nirgon]

Okay for the whiners...

You guys got away with fucking murder exploiting content for a year and currently your guild leader is exempt from a deserved banning.

Change your fucking bind spot.

Stop relying on invis pulling shit through perma and, oh no the worst thing in the world..... some of the people who aren't in your guild (who has had nearly free reign of content, server resets and patch notes made in their favor) will be able to grind an old world frozen basement with no item or cash drops.

I mean are you serious? You're really STILL complaining (24 hours later even) about this after everything that's been handed to you, done for you and looked the other way when you did it?

Absolutely fucking pathetic. Not trolling, I actually feed bad for how pathetic that is. Just...

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Twain [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sirken,
Would anyone bound in these zones be given a bind at pots since they would of bound there if they knew this would be changed? I don't really care about binds but it would at least be fair to bind those characters at the pots.

lol, no. thats the dumbest shit ive read in this thread so far.

[Stinkum]

dumb as fuck yea but i still think heartbrand comparing this ruling to the prohibition and slavery takes the cake