PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[heartbrand]

Where have I justified circumventing gm decisions? Arguing for revisiting the FFA distinction =/= arguing to circumvent rule. Yet in your personal life I bet you smoke weed even though its illegal on the premise that the rationale for the law is illogical.

[Sektor]

48

[p-niner]

Nope job

Sorry

Keep trying to lawyer rule bends for exploit king nizzar +dkp

And I live in a medical marijuana state and have a script just dont use currently =)

[quido]

Does this apply to blue also? I know a certain asshole player who has a character bound in KC.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope job

Sorry

Keep trying to lawyer rule bends for exploit king nizzar +dkp

And I live in a medical marijuana state and have a script just dont use currently =)

Medical marijuana laws violate federal law and will likely be overturned by the Supreme Court

[Stinkum]

heartbrand's public meltdown continues as he officially reaches 50 posts in in a span of 2 hours in the same thread

the crowd popcorn.gif'ing as this man has an aneurysm in real time over everquest bind points

[Sektor]

49

[heartbrand]

The rationale here by people is just comical. Are you ok when the government says online poker and sports betting is illegal? Do you just go o yaw that's classic np np good decision? are you cool with blue laws in your states that forbid you from buying alcohol on sundays? Sodomy laws? You think the current patent law system is ok? You always drive the speed limit, have always filed your taxes timely, report all of your income even the off the books stuff etc., etc.? But yet in this thread people espousing that rules should never be questioned ever and that it's tantamount to a great affront to ask whether or not rules should be changed or modified. No one is saying let's just fuck the GM's and ignore the rule, I'm just saying we should revisit whether the rule makes sense anymore while simultaneously obeying it until a change does or does not happen.

[GoodGuyAmes]

I wonder if they will choose to even hear the case though. 5 of the 9 justices have been appointed by conservative presidents with three of them remaining from the Reagan era. They might decide not to hear it because of their belief in strong state rights with the government trying to meddle in their affairs as little as possible. And yes the federal law prohibits its illegality in the U.S but it has not been actively in-forced for quite some time as anyone who has been in California can attest to. There are more marijuana dispensaries in L.A then there are Starbucks.

[Stinkum]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]