PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[Nirgon]

Hence stfu do it

[Andis]

again dont matter what was and what is currently

these zones were labeled raid zones for a reason

life isnt fair, there will be no explanation for everything, is all i can say

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Andis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

again dont matter what was and what is currently

these zones were labeled raid zones for a reason

life isnt fair, there will be no explanation for everything, is all i can say

The "reason" is not classic, it has no basis in classic EverQuest, which supposedly is what the vision of this server is. Therefore, since the application of FFA to zones was arbitrarily made over a year and a half ago, I would think we could re-visit the issue now to see if it's working as intended or not. My belief is that there is no need for this non-classic addition now that casters spawn with zero mana, but if you're going to stick with it then you MUST make KC a FFA non-bind zone as well since bind-rushing tactics have been used there repeatedly during VS raids, which is supposedly the reason the FFA tags and non-binding change were instituted to prevent.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hence stfu do it

I expect better out of you Nirgon on a subject of non-classic changes to EQ with a ruling that makes no sense and has no basis in classic EQ. Your bias and hatred for people on a server you don't play is clouding your vision and leading you to espouse views that are contrary to your very core and essence, "Classic".

[Nirgon]

I see your point and ban Nizzar and Tune for stripping Beo

[heartbrand]

Please point me to the rule about transferring items from shared accounts.

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How is it an "exploit" if there was never a written or even verbal rule against it?

LOL. really man?

so by your logic, its technically not an exploit until someone makes the staff aware of it? logic so incredibly flawed

[p-niner]

HB lawyering beats himself. Oil Baron XantILLE would be embarrassed to be lumped in with you as a member of the same alumni.

Says make all dragon zones no bind, then explains how perma and solb are unbindablr becausr considered FFA zones.

Not... sure... if... srs.

[Nirgon]

Sirken I'm going to save you from this, just try and decide which lense you should view their posts with.

I suggest the "shut up and do it" approach.

[Gustoo]

Nirgon is right.

"Classic" needs to stop being a reason for anything on this custom server. I totally love it but it makes me ill having the worst features of classic while all of the important aspects are completely non classic.

Give us a classic ruleset and work on classic resists and IMO most importantly classic NPC aggro in city zones.

Then "classic" can justifiably be used as a reason for anything here.

I'm not saying that changing raid zone bind rules isn't a good idea but don't say it is for a classic experience because as mentioned FFA zones are not classic and you seem to like those. Just say you think its good for the box.

Thanks for all your hard work devs.