![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
Is invis pulling "obviously" exploiting as well? What about keeping your bind @ TD Pots after Verant realized the game breaking nature of said bind? Was that also "obviously" exploiting? Being able to buff level 1's with level 60 buffs isn't classic and is being changed, is doing so right now "obviously" exploiting as well? Please, enlighten me with your vast knowledge of what else is "obviously" exploiting.
Quote:
That's all we have on the subject. Somehow you've extrapolated from that one sentence that keeping the bind is exploiting. So, in defense of my argument we have fourteen plus months of silence, zero posts or comments on retaining the bind, zero precedent for it being against the rules. In your defense you have that it is "obviously" exploiting. We call a statement or a "defense" like that in law a conclusory statement, I hope your day to day logic is better than your ForumQuest logic. Here's a link with some examples of conclusory statements to help improve your logic in the future: http://members.shaw.ca/tjromaniuk/wp02v04p05.htm
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | |||
|
Last edited by heartbrand; 06-25-2013 at 11:29 AM..
|
|
|||
|
|