![]() |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Since Zilo's doggy only has 1 hp, he'd get a very poor return for reclaiming it. This however, may not be enough to stop Zilo. He's been known to slaughter dogs, kittens, and small children alike for the thrill alone. Also, to support your agruement, the below was taken from a classic "shaman" FoH website. (http://www.notacult.com/guide_trollshaman.html) Quote:
__________________
Abacab tells Phallax, "To be honest you're just a bunch of little bugs on my windshield that I have to wipe clean before I start cruise controlin' into phat lewtz."
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#12
|
|||
|
In any case, you would probably regain mana faster by simply meditating. Pet casting times are anything but squick.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
guys, there's a bunch of non-classic things going on here. It's actually a load of crap too because they "fix" the XP (royally f'ing over people) but don't fix the nice perks like this.
1) Reclaim energy 2) Sword of Rune proc on all mobs 3) reclaim energy on eye of zomm | ||
|
|
|||
|
#14
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Girth Matters (Retired)
50 Ogre Shadow Knight Mugatoo <Center For Ants> 45 Iksar Monk "You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas." | |||
|
|
||||
|
#15
|
||||
|
Jify is right, the mana gained back is proportional to the HP of the pet, which makes using the spell to regain mana rather ineffective*.
The argument about classes who lack reclaim energy already have means of getting mana back fast doesn't make sense. Even enchanters have reclaim energy and they use their pets far less than shamans and they don't have a problem getting mana back. Shamans using a pet focus to reclaim their pets would mostly be a way to mitigate the enormous mana drain of trying to get a decent pet; at 500 mana a cast, medding for 15mn until you finally get a good pet isn't fun, it's a damn chore. Quote:
*Furthermore, some dev (Haynar?) stated that he was working on trying to implement pet canni for mages (reclaim high level earth pet for more mana), a minor "exploit" that became a minor "feature" over time. After all, this is emu is trying to replicate EQ the way it was, not the way it was supposed to be (minus powerful, glaring expoits). I've wasted enough time replying to random people. I've presented facts. I've made my case. I'll be waiting for a dev reply before making any further posts. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#16
|
||||
|
Quote:
The word here is "Should" be based on the HP of the pet, but not the"number" 1, 50, 125, 375 hp or whatever. It should be based on the %HP the pet has left when you reclaim it. if pet is at 33% hp you will only get 25% mana return This is not the case on P99 However. Try reclaiming a pet a 1% or 100%. you get the exact same amount back - 75% mana of pet summoning. Hense it can be vastly abused on P99, unless they change how reclaim works. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#17
|
|||
|
bump
__________________
Pyrocat the Protector of Vul
Proud member of The Safehouse since 2000 Pyrocat (60 TRL SHM) Orochi (60 IKS NEC) | ||
|
|
|||
|
#18
|
||||
|
Quote:
Haynar | |||
|
|
||||
|
#19
|
|||||||||||
|
In my attempts at finding the formula, what I found was information on why pet canni doesn't exist within the scope of P99.
Quotes upon quotes and evidence explaining that pet canni consisted of several things: Improved Reclaim Energy AA, a Summoning Efficiency focus item, a mount, It was based off of Current HP, not percentage of HP. If it was based off of percentage of HP you could use any pet of any level. Mages cannid the focused earth pet or MS2 for a reason: Its high HP. And here's your citation! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I couldn't find a formula anywhere, but it would seem that it doesn't matter. | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
#20
|
|||
|
For what it's worth, I seem to remember that you got full mana back for reclaiming pets originally. It was later changed to be proportionate to the hp of the pet.
As for the OP, if there are no patch notes stating that the mage focus items were changed to be clickable from inventory by everyone, you have to assume that it was like that from original release. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|