Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2013, 04:31 PM
Vondra Vondra is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lecompte [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Couple of Notes:
1) 70% of the fun in EQ happens GETTING to level 60 so if you have a group that is a lot of fun, who cares about the penalty?
2) I wear plate.
3) Racial penalties are not shared.
4) Rangers can old agro, and if you have enough slow/dps, it don't matter if you tank worse than a chanter w/o rune 5. (group last night with two backstabbing chanter pets can attest to this)


As a ranger, who has brought the 40% penalty to every group I've been in, I've enjoyed leveling. That exhaltation you get from completing a level? Imagine a level that is 40% harder and thus, 40% more exciting when you finally do it and that is just by the numbers -- disregarding the fact that it is 40% more challenging to get a group.

All the exp penalties are shared, both class and racial, because the penalty is inherent to the total onhand exp the player has.

The penalty itself is just how much exp it takes you to level. The "penalty" isn't what's actually figured in the group, it's the total exp the person has. A freshly dinged lev 50 ranger has 140% of the exp of a freshly dinged lev 50 human cleric. That's what the calculation is looking at when determining how much exp each person gets. Not what level they are, not what race/class they are, but how much total exp they have.

If one person has 140000 exp and the other person has 100000 exp, then they group together, the person with 140000 exp is going to get about 58% of the exp the mob has to give (140000 + 100000 = 240000, 140000/240000 = ~.583). Then the remaining ~42% to the other guy. Whether that happened because the 140000 xp guy is a few levels higher, or is a bard, ranger etc, or any combination of things resulting in one person having more total exp on hand...the game doesn't look at.

If it was a troll SK, then we'd be looking at the same deal. The troll part would still be "shared", since it contributed to them having a longer exp bar. In the troll SK case, the freshly dinged lev 50 troll sk has 168% of the exp onhand that the freshly dinged 50 human cleric does. Calculation changes accordingly, concept remains the same.
Last edited by Vondra; 06-10-2013 at 04:41 PM..
  #2  
Old 06-10-2013, 04:52 PM
lecompte lecompte is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Down wind from RnF, 10x showers a day
Posts: 1,100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vondra [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If it was a troll SK, then we'd be looking at the same deal. The troll part would still be "shared", since it contributed to them having a longer exp bar. In the troll SK case, the freshly dinged lev 50 troll sk has 168% of the exp onhand that the freshly dinged 50 human cleric does. Calculation changes accordingly, concept remains the same.
You added substantially to your post after I replied so I'm going to address this part here.

I think the racial part of the penalty plays in to the XP bar (the troll warrior has 20% (http://wiki.project1999.org/Game_Mec...ence_Penalties) more exp in his bar than the human warrior, and thus it isn't shared with group) while the xp BONUS is shared with group, because that is applied to the xp before it is distributed to the group/player. Likewise, the troll sks personal penalty will be perceived as follows: If there is a total of 70% exp penalty in the group, (SK, Monk, Chanter) then the xp from each mob will be slashed by 70 percent before it is applied to each party member, then the racial experience bonus/penalty will be applied.
  #3  
Old 06-10-2013, 04:55 PM
lecompte lecompte is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Down wind from RnF, 10x showers a day
Posts: 1,100
Default

Okay Vondra, I think we are in for agree to disagree time now. I'm pretty sure my analogy is flawed in some way, and I know yours is so we should let it lie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.].


EDIT:
Pleas note that my guild leaders say racial penalties aren't shared so to have any other stance is certain death and I will stand by it to end!
Last edited by lecompte; 06-10-2013 at 05:08 PM..
  #4  
Old 06-10-2013, 04:57 PM
Vondra Vondra is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lecompte [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You added substantially to your post after I replied so I'm going to address this part here.

I think the racial part of the penalty plays in to the XP bar (the troll warrior has 20% (http://wiki.project1999.org/Game_Mec...ence_Penalties) more exp in his bar than the human warrior, and thus it isn't shared with group) while the xp BONUS is shared with group, because that is applied to the xp before it is distributed to the group/player. Likewise, the troll sks personal penalty will be perceived as follows: If there is a total of 70% exp penalty in the group, (SK, Monk, Chanter) then the xp from each mob will be slashed by 70 percent before it is applied to each party member, then the racial experience bonus/penalty will be applied.
The troll warrior having 20% more exp in his bar affects the group since having 20% more exp means he will take a larger portion of the groups exp because of it, since the total exp onhand is all that is consulted.

The exp calculation doesn't take into account any of the penalties. You're making the mistake of adding up 40, 20, and 10 from sk monk chanter, the exp calculation when handing out exp never takes those things into consideration. It doesn't make any calculation regarding a 70% total penalty, or any penalty at all.

It just looks at the total exp onhand of each character and hands out exp in accordance with it.


It sees the sk with 140000 exp, the human monk with 120000 exp, and the chanter with 110000 exp.

140000 + 120000 + 110000 = 370000

It gives the SK 140000/370000 = ~.378 or 37.8% of the exp.

The monk gets 120000/370000 = ~.324 or 32.4% of the exp.

Then the chanter gets the rest.

If the human monk was instead say...an iksar shaman (which has a 20% racial penalty, but no class penalty) the result would be the same as a human monk. They'd have 20% more exp on hand than the human cleric of same level. Same calculation, 120000 exp total for them, same 32.4% of the exp for them in this group if they replaced the human monk.
Last edited by Vondra; 06-10-2013 at 05:07 PM..
  #5  
Old 06-10-2013, 05:39 PM
xCry0x xCry0x is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vondra [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

140000 + 120000 + 110000 = 370000

It gives the SK 140000/370000 = ~.378 or 37.8% of the exp.

The monk gets 120000/370000 = ~.324 or 32.4% of the exp.

Then the chanter gets the rest.
Ah that makes a ton of sense. Didn't understand that your exp cut was essentially derived from your perceived level based on total exp.

Remind me never to group with a Troll SK that is also higher level than me =P
__________________
-------------
Halmir - 60 Cleric
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.