Areola: The Breast Forgotten Feature

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

to say something like "large areolas are gross" is insane. The totality of the titty must be taken in and its aesthetics assessed artistically.

To approach your enjoyment of beauty like you are checking items off a list -- small areolae, outie, no stretch marks -- is to submit your pleasure to prevailing social standards, in a sense cuckolding yourself even as you feign enjoyment of the titty. You are not truly enjoying yourself if you are assessing the mammary appendage in this way; instead you are translating the titty into its approximate estimate in fiat shekels and allowing yourself only as much enjoyment as (((they))) dictate you deserve for making this financial acquisition. This idol is your God and it is evident even in how you approach something as primal as tittymeat.

You are a nasty, small person if you operate this way. Anything can be done right, including large areolae.

Well, I am both nasty and small, but that is another discussion ^^ I am generally inclined to agree that "large" areola can be done right and indeed my areola-size-tolerance has broadened over time, but this is a question of excess and ideals with respect to the greater composition as outlined within the poll candidates.

Many things can be made to work and work well, but because they do does not diminish the general propensity of the thing. Large areola are indisputably disadvantaged in the arena of aesthetic prominence whether exceptional specimens exist or not.

If ever we are to right the injustice of areola size bias we must understand the nature of preference and whence it cometh, be it inborn or socially infused zog water as you assert.

What do you consider ideal?

[maskedmelon]

I should add for clarity, large areola are like fingernail beds that bisect the field between the cuticle and fingertip, or second toes that surpass the big toe in reach. Both are tolerable and may even be appreciated as a part of a larger composition, but their nature is generally speaking, deleterious. That is to say, in the absence of other more virtuous characteristics, they are incapable of sparing the greater composition duly assigned ill-regard, as unfortunate as that may be :/